This Author published in this journals
All Journal Honeste Vivere
Ritonga, Francois Geny
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PEMBAHARUAN KETENTUAN PENGAMPUAN DALAM KUHPERDATA DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PELINDUNGAN HUKUM Ritonga, Francois Geny; Sitohang, Mawar
Honeste Vivere Vol 34 No 2 (2024): July
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v34i2.320

Abstract

Civil law regulates the substance of the rights (recht) and obligations (verplicht) of legal subjects. According to Soebekti, civil law is all the basic laws that regulate individual interests. One of these interest arrangements is regulated in the provisions of Article 433 of the Civil Code (Civil Code). If the interests are met by the conditions as regulated in these provisions, the entitled parties can submit a request for a Determination of Custody through the District Court. However, with the times and progressive legal developments, there are individual interests that need to receive legal protection, including people with mental disabilities and/or intellectual disabilities. The Constitutional Court has decided to grant partial material review of Article 433 of the Civil Code against the 1945 Constitution through Decision Number 93/PUU-XX/2022, where this decision can demonstrate the renewal of the guardianship provisions in the Civil Code in realizing legal protection.
KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (PTUN) DALAM MEMERIKSA DAN MENGADILI SUATU KEPUTUSAN KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM (KPU) Ritonga, Francois Geny; Marbun, Caroline Zilena
Honeste Vivere Vol 35 No 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v35i1.426

Abstract

Disputes can occur in social life and allow for this preservation to occur between the community and State Administrative bodies and/or officials. In particular, this writing allows for the creation of state administration between the community, in this case the members of the district/city level general election commission and State Administration bodies and/or officials, in this case the General Election Commission. The existence of the State Administrative Court has the authority to examine, decide and finalize settlements within the scope of state administration. The authority of the State Administrative Court has been mandated by the provisions of Article 47 of Law Number 5 of 1986 of the State Administrative Court to complete the settlement of state administration as intended in the provisions of Article 1 number 10 of Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Justice
DINAMIKA KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN DALAM MENGADILI SENGKETA PERTANAHAN ANTARA PERADILAN UMUM DAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Ritonga, Francois Geny; Bethesda, Corine R.
Honeste Vivere Vol 35 No 2 (2025): July
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v35i2.570

Abstract

The rights of Indonesian citizens are protected by law, including the right to own, obtain, and enjoy land ownership rights, both individually and collectively. Over time, conflicts or disputes often arise as a result of the growing needs of society, including land disputes. Land conflicts or disputes can occur and various problems arise, including: the existence of double certificates (overlapping), unlawful acts, ownership disputes, and others. Conflict or dispute resolution can be resolved through non-litigation or litigation. In the case of litigation, the parties often want a resolution through the Court, either the District Court (PN) or the State Administrative Court (PTUN). The Court has the authority to examine and adjudicate its own case, however, in resolving land conflicts or disputes, it can be resolved between these courts, thus creating dynamics in the court's authority in terms of the Court's competence in adjudicating land disputes