Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Membentuk Karakter Anti Korupsi pada Generasi Muda dengan Nilai-Nilai Luhur Pancasila Moh. Ali Hofi
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v1i2.663

Abstract

The easy generation as the successor to the future generation of the nation has an important and urgent role on its shoulders. One of the roles that must be shared by the nation's generation, especially millennials, is how they are able and have a character that is in accordance with the noble values ​​of Pancasila, especially in law enforcement and anti-corruption behavior. It is important to know that corruption is a problem in Indonesia that has not yet been resolved and there tends to be an increase in cases from the previous year. This indicates that the regeneration of the Indonesian nation is on the verge of failure in forming the character of an anti-corruption generation of the nation. By actively and massively applying and implementing Pancasila values, it is hoped that this anti-corruption attitude will be able to grow. In this article, the normative research type is used to analyze the above issues which are the focus of the research. The results of the research show that the existence of Pancasila as a way of life for the younger generation of the Indonesian nation is not working effectively, so concrete efforts are needed to instill these values, one of which is education and the formation of the Pancasila character, both through formal/educational and non-formal institutions.
Konsep Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif Ach. Raziqin; Ainun Najib; Moh. Ali Hofi
Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): GJMI- APRIL
Publisher : PT. Gudang Pustaka Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59435/gjmi.v3i4.1535

Abstract

Dialektika dalam upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia berjalan seiring proklamasi kemedakaan itu sendiri diikrarkan. Pasalnya korupsi bukan hanya berakibat pada mangkraknya pertumbuhan ekonomi negara saja, namun lebih dari itu secara tidak langsung dapat mengancam terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat pada umumnya. Berulangkali pemerintah mengkontruksi produk hukum dalam usahanya untuk memberantas namun berujung pada titik revisi. Sehingga dalam perkembangan terakhir ini lahir istilah konsep justice collaborator sebagai intrumen sentaral dalam penanganan kasus pidana luar biasa, dimana seorang pelaku kriminal dijadikan saksi dalam proses investigasi kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Untuk memastikan bahwa kerangka konsep justice collaborator ini apakah sudah merepresentasikan tujuan hukum yaitu terciptanya stabilistas masyarakat apa tidak, maka perlu dikaji melalui paradigma hukum progresif, dimana salah satu spritit hukum progresif itu sendiri yaitu adanya hukum untuk manusia bukan sebaliknya manusia mengabdi kepada hukum.
Eksistensi Delik Konstitusional: Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Tata Negara Moh. Ali Hofi
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret: Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v2i1.2142

Abstract

A constitutional offense constitutes a violation of the fundamental norms enshrined in the constitution, committed by public officials or state institutions. Such violations are not only political in nature but also carry juridical dimensions closely related to criminal law. This article aims to examine the existence and urgency of regulating constitutional offenses from two main perspectives: constitutional law and criminal law. The research employs a normative juridical approach, emphasizing conceptual analysis and relevant legal regulations. This study also highlights the necessity of integrating constitutional mechanisms with criminal law enforcement to establish a system of accountability that is fair, proportional, and upholds the rule of law. Harmonizing these two areas of law is crucial to preserving the supremacy of the constitution in the practice of state governance.
Penerapan Asas Sidang Terbuka untuk Umum dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Melalui E-COURT Dina Yaniar Putri; Moh. Ali Hofi
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i1.133

Abstract

E-Court is a court instrument in seeking legal certainty so that cases can be resolved quickly. The scope of E-court includes online case registration (e-filling), online estimation of case costs (e-skum), online payment of downpayment (e-payment), online summons of parties (e-summons) and online hearings (e-litigation) by sending court documents (Replik, Duplik, Conclusion, Answer). The focus that will be discussed in this scientific work includes first, how to read the judge’s decision via E-court. Second, how to apply the principle of hearings open to the public via E-court. To facilitate understanding in this research, researchers used a Normative Juridical research method with a Legislative approach. The data colletion technique carried out by the researcher was by identifying and analyzing statutory regulations, namely PERMA Number 1 Of 2019. The results of the research carried out by the researcher can be concluded that first, the application of the principle of open to the public hearings is appropriate and reflects the applicable statutory regulations. And will still be implemented, but with several restrictions on the number of court visitors and the distance between visitors. Second, regarding the reading of the judge’s decision via e-court, it is legally considered to have been attended by the parties and carried out in a trial open to the public. And has legal force and legal consequences.