Syah, Aurellia Zerikha
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Terungkapnya Kasus Bullying di SMA Binus Serpong Ardiana, Oktavia Dwi; Narindra, Rochella Amalia; Syah, Aurellia Zerikha; Azzahra, Dinda; Prasetyo, Handoyo
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11652674

Abstract

This study discusses the impact of social media on the revelation of bullying cases at Binus Serpong High School. Social media has become a significant platform for spreading information and revealing incidents of bullying among teenagers. This study employs a normative juridical method to analyze how social media can accelerate the process of uncovering and handling bullying cases, as well as its impact on the community and the school administration. The results of the research show that social media is effective in raising awareness and facilitating quick responses to bullying cases. Additionally, social media also provides emotional support for victims through anti-bullying campaigns and online communities. However, there are risks of information misuse and the potential occurrence of cyberbullying. Schools are expected to take transparent and fair actions in following up on bullying cases by coordinating with the police and the Indonesian Child Protection Commission (KPAI). This study recommends increasing education about bullying, providing psychological support, and implementing strict anti-bullying policies within the school environment.
Kepailitan Akibat Cidera Janji Dalam PKPU : Studi Kasus PT Njonja Meneer Dalam Putusan Nomor 1397 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017 Syah, Aurellia Zerikha
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is a legal mechanism that allows debtors to restructure their debts through a peace agreement (composition) with creditors. However, when the debtor fails to perform the obligations stipulated in the agreement, such failure may be classified as a breach of contract (wanprestasi) and serve as a valid legal basis for creditors to file a bankruptcy petition. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions concerning the annulment of a composition agreement in PKPU and to examine the actions of PT Njonja Meneer that were deemed a breach of contract in the implementation of such agreement. The research adopts a normative juridical method with a statutory and case study approach, based on the Supreme Court Decision Number 1397 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017. The findings indicate that PT Njonja Meneer’s failure to substantially fulfill its payment obligations constituted a material breach of the court-approved agreement, thereby justifying the creditor’s petition for bankruptcy. The Supreme Court ruling reinforces that the execution of a peace agreement must be carried out in good faith, as failure to do so may result in the revocation of the agreement and a declaration of bankruptcy against the debtor.
Analisis Hukum Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Terhadap Kasus Korupsi Proyek Tol Mbz: Pelanggaran Tender dan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Setiawan, Antonius Ryan Dandy; Syah, Aurellia Zerikha; Sihotang, Josua Ferdinand; Narindra, Rochella Amalia
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17698517

Abstract

This study analyzes legal violations in the procurement of goods/services in the corruption case of the Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed (MBZ) Toll Road project, focusing on deviations from the principles of Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 and the application of corporate criminal liability under Article 20 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes (UU Tipikor). The case reveals patterns of tender collusion, technical specification manipulation, budget mark-ups, and collusion causing state losses up to IDR 510 billion, violating principles of efficiency, transparency, accountability, competitiveness, and value for money. Using a normative juridical approach with secondary data from regulations, court decisions, and scholarly literature, the analysis concludes that corporations like KSO Waskita-Acset meet the corporate fault criteria under Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016, warranting fines, additional sanctions such as blacklisting, and asset recovery. The study emphasizes the need for procurement system reforms to prevent systemic corruption.