Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Katalis Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Matematika Reflection: Islamic Education Journal
Rossi Zetria Idallah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementasi Strategi Pembelajaran Afektif yang Dilakukan Nabi Khidir Kepada Nabi Musa Serta Implikasinya pada Zaman Sekarang Rossa Zetria Idallah; Rossi Zetria Idallah; Gusmaneli Gusmaneli
Katalis Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Matematika Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Katalis Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Matematika
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/katalis.v1i2.220

Abstract

This article aims to describe (tell) the form of implementation of affective learning carried out by the Prophet Khidir for the Prophet Musa and its application today. This research uses library research methodology and is qualitative in nature, because the data collected uses textual analysis contained in books and journals related to models, approaches, methods and learning techniques. The results of this research are the first in this study to obtain an understanding of affective learning strategies. Both characteristics of affective learning strategies. The three models of affective learning strategies. Fourth difficulty in affective learning strategies. Fifth, the implications of the affective learning strategy carried out by the prophet Khidir to the prophet Musa. Sixth: Implementation of today's affective learning strategies.
Perbandingan Pendidikan di Negara Maju (Negara Amerika Serikat dengan Negara Jerman) Rossa Zetria Idallah; Mislaini Mislaini; Rossi Zetria Idallah
Reflection : Islamic Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Islamic Education Journal
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/reflection.v2i1.443

Abstract

Education is an important foundation for individual and societal development. Education systems in various countries have unique characteristics that reflect their values, history and socio-economic needs. In a global context, the education systems in the United States and Germany are examples of two very different but equally influential approaches in shaping the future of their young generation. Education in the United States is known for its diverse and flexible system. The country has adopted a decentralized model, in which educational responsibility rests largely with states and school districts. Curriculum often varies from region to region, giving freedom to adapt course material to local needs. This system also prioritizes the principle of inclusion, with various programs that support diversity and access to education for all students, including those with special needs. High schools offer a variety of educational pathways, including academic, vocational, and arts pathways, giving students the freedom to choose according to their interests and talents. Education in Germany is famous for its structured system and focus on early specialization. After completing basic education, students in Germany follow different educational paths according to their abilities and interests, through a system known as, Realschule or Gymnasium. Vocational education is also receiving great attention in Germany, with many students following a dual system that combines practical training in the workplace with theoretical education at school. This system aims to ensure that students gain skills relevant to the needs of the job market and facilitate a smooth transition from education to the world of work. With these differences in approach, each country offers valuable insight into how education can be organized to meet social and economic goals. Comparative analysis between these two systems can provide insight into the strengths and challenges of each model, as well as the potential for implementing best practices in a global educational context.
Co-Authors Gusmaneli Gusmaneli Mislaini Mislaini Rossa Zetria Idallah