Milinda Nur Indah Puspita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

SOSIALISASI PENTINGNYA GIZI SEIMBANG DAN PENGENALAN ISI PIRINGKU BERSAMA BUNDA TEMAN PAUD Lailatul Ikhsanti; Malkia Adeelin Candiani; Milinda Nur Indah Puspita
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia (JPMI) Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Publikasi Inspirasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62017/jpmi.v1i6.2176

Abstract

Saat ini di Indonesia sedang menghadapi masalah gizi ganda yaitu masalah gizi kurang yang mengakibatkan anak anak stunting dan uderweight; dan gizi berlebih yang menyebabkan obesitas dan diabetes. Tujuan dari kegiatan sosialisasi ini adalah untuk memberikan pengetahuan kepada orang tua mengenai gizi seimbang dan memilah makanan untuk mendukung pertumbuhan dan perkembangan anak. Metode pelaksanaan yang dilakukan dengan observasi posyandu Dukuh Sutorejo, Kecamatan Mulyorejo, Kota Surabaya. Target sosialisasi gizi seimbang pada ibu yang memiliki usia rentang 2 - 5 tahun. Sosialisasi dilaksanakan di Pos PAUD Terpadu “Taman Siswa” Labansari Surabaya. Kegiatan ini diawali dengan edukasi melalui pemaparan materi terkait pedoman gizi seimbang dalam bentuk slide powerpoint yang dilanjutkan dengan sesi diskusi dan bermain games setelah selesai pemaparan dan sesi diskusi. Pengetahuan wali murid di Pos Paud Terpadu "Taman Siswa" terkait pedoman gizi seimbang, khususnya dalam penyajian makanan sehat untuk anak usia 2-5 tahun, masih kurang.
Scheduling Analysis using CPM, PERT, and LoB Method Milinda Nur Indah Puspita; I Nyoman Dita Pahang Putra
Sustainable Civil Building Management and Engineering Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/scbmej.v3i1.5392

Abstract

Project delays frequently occur in construction projects and often result from the inability to accurately identify critical activities within the project network, leading to ineffective time control. Therefore, it is necessary to apply scheduling methods that are appropriate to the characteristics of the project in order to improve time control effectiveness and minimize the risk of delays. The aim of this research is to analyze scheduling results using the Critical Path Method, Program Evaluation and Review Technique, and Line Of Balance method. Also, to determine the difference in project completion duration using the PERT, CPM and LoB Methods. This research employs a quantitative method with a comparative approach, using secondary data that was obtained from a supervisory consultant. The data includes the durations and the work list. The analysis data is obtained to determine the critical path using PERT, CPM and LoB methods. The PERT method calculates three estimation times: optimistic duration, most likely duration, and pessimistic duration to determine the critical path. The results show the CPM and LoB method predicts the completion project in 159 days, and the PERT method predicts the completion project in 164 days. The difference in completing the project using the CMP and PERT methods is 5 days. The difference in project completion duration between LOB and PERT is 5 days. In contrast, no difference is observed between the CPM and LOB methods, as both yield an identical project completion time of 159 days.