Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Majority Science Journal
Putra, Reza Alamsyah
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Efforts to Raise Legal Awareness For The People of Purwajaya Village to Have A Land Certificate as Authentic Proof of Land Ownership Sitorus, Silvan Daniel; Maula, Naufal Rodiyatul; Makhron, Fiki Muzaki; Putra, Reza Alamsyah; Bilan, Hikmat; Lukmanulhakim, Zaidan; Arafat, Zarisnov
MSJ : Majority Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): MSJ-AUGUST
Publisher : PT. Hafasy Dwi Nawasena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61942/msj.v2i3.197

Abstract

Purwajaya Village, located in Tempuran District, Karawang Regency, faces significant problems related to land certification. Many of these villagers do not yet have land certificates, which shows a lack of awareness about the importance of certification as proof of legal ownership. To overcome this issue, the village government carried out the socialization of the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) to speed up the certification process. This research on efforts to increase public awareness uses a qualitative descriptive methodology. In this context, the theory of legal awareness by Soejono Sukanto is used as a reference to evaluate the effectiveness of the program. This theory includes four main factors: (1) knowledge of legal provisions, (2) recognition of legal provisions, (3) respect for legal provisions, and (4) compliance with legal provisions. Through the lens of this theory, PTSL socialization efforts are expected to increase community legal awareness and improve the problem of land certification in Purwajaya Village
Legal Certainty For The Judiciary That Is Authorized To Adjudicate Corruption Cases That Occurred In Basarnas RI Putra, Reza Alamsyah; Arafat, Zarisnov; Abas, Muhamad
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2419

Abstract

Article 42 of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law grants the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) coordinating authority to oversee the investigation, inquiry, and prosecution of corruption crimes jointly committed by legal subjects under the jurisdiction of both military and general courts. The normative juridical research method, as a legal research approach, bases its analysis on literature review or secondary data sources as the primary foundation of the study, conducted through an in-depth examination of legal regulations and various literature references relevant to the issue under review. Based on an analysis of the relevant statutory provisions, it can be concluded that the Basarnas corruption case involving military personnel should be adjudicated by the Corruption Court, with several legal considerations. The Corruption Court is the competent body to try corruption cases within the National Search and Rescue Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, while maintaining institutional coordination between the KPK and the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) as mandated by the Constitutional Court's decision. An in-depth analysis of the applicable statutory provisions indicates that the legal provisions regarding jurisdiction over corruption cases involving military personnel have undergone a paradigmatic shift from a personal jurisdiction approach to a subject matter jurisdiction approach. Based on this ruling, and considering that the Basarnas corruption case was initially investigated and discovered by the KPK, the Corruption Court is the competent body to adjudicate the case, including that of Air Marshal Henri Alfiandi as an active member of the TNI.
Legal Certainty For The Judiciary That Is Authorized To Adjudicate Corruption Cases That Occurred In Basarnas RI Putra, Reza Alamsyah; Arafat, Zarisnov; Abas, Muhamad
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2419

Abstract

Article 42 of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law grants the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) coordinating authority to oversee the investigation, inquiry, and prosecution of corruption crimes jointly committed by legal subjects under the jurisdiction of both military and general courts. The normative juridical research method, as a legal research approach, bases its analysis on literature review or secondary data sources as the primary foundation of the study, conducted through an in-depth examination of legal regulations and various literature references relevant to the issue under review. Based on an analysis of the relevant statutory provisions, it can be concluded that the Basarnas corruption case involving military personnel should be adjudicated by the Corruption Court, with several legal considerations. The Corruption Court is the competent body to try corruption cases within the National Search and Rescue Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, while maintaining institutional coordination between the KPK and the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) as mandated by the Constitutional Court's decision. An in-depth analysis of the applicable statutory provisions indicates that the legal provisions regarding jurisdiction over corruption cases involving military personnel have undergone a paradigmatic shift from a personal jurisdiction approach to a subject matter jurisdiction approach. Based on this ruling, and considering that the Basarnas corruption case was initially investigated and discovered by the KPK, the Corruption Court is the competent body to adjudicate the case, including that of Air Marshal Henri Alfiandi as an active member of the TNI.
Co-Authors Abas, Muhamad Arafat, Zarisnov Bilan, Hikmat Lukmanulhakim, Zaidan Makhron, Fiki Muzaki Maula, Naufal Rodiyatul Sitorus, Silvan Daniel