Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WAJAH HUKUM Amicus Curiae
Mayva, Verandha
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EKSAMINASI PUTUSAN KPPU MENGENAI RAHASIA PERUSAHAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT: Examination Of KPPU Decisions Regarding Company Confidential That Might Lead To Unfair Business Practices Mayva, Verandha; Anggraini, Anna Maria Tri
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ygbbhn17

Abstract

The guideline for article 23 of Law Number 5 of 1999 not yet approved, making company secrets andcriteria for company secrets often equated with the meaning of Trade Secret as regulated in Law Number30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets. The main problem is whether the information in the contractagreement between the musician and the recording company and company data about DMO in thecontract for the procurement of goods and/or services are included in the criteria for company secretsaccording to the perspective of business competition law and whether the decision of the panel of judgesin decision number 19/KPPU-L/ 2007 and number 35/KPPU-I/2010 are correct. This research usingnormative legal research by secondary and primary data. This research is descriptive and conclusionswith deductive reasoning. The results are, the essence the two decisions both discuss company secretswhich must keep the secret because it has economic value and if it open to the public will bring losses tothe company whose secrets are leaked so that both of them are included in the criteria of companysecrets in the perspective of business competition law. The decisions must contains more sanction onpenal law.
Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan Poligami Berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Mayva, Verandha; Prihatini, Farida
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i1.1729

Abstract

Marriage according to Law Number. 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) is based on the principle of monogamy, which allows the practice of polygamy under certain conditions. In polygamous marriages, the division of shared property is regulated by Islamic law and legislation to ensure justice and protect the rights of the parties involved. However, the division of joint property often causes problems due to the lack of clarity in the mechanisms for calculation and proof of ownership. This research aims to analyze the mechanism of joint property division in polygamous marriages based on the KHI, with a primary focus on Decision Number 555/K/AG/2012. The approach used is normative juridical with a qualitative analysis method, referring to the analysis of legislation, namely Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage and the KHI. The analysis results show that the division of joint property in polygamous marriages is determined based on the time of acquisition, where property obtained during the marriage with the first wife becomes the joint right of the husband and the first wife. Meanwhile, property acquired in subsequent marriages involves the next wives in its ownership. The case study of Decision Number 555/K/AG/2012 emphasizes the importance of proving the period of asset acquisition to ensure fairness in the distribution.
Co-Authors Anna Maria Tri Anggraini Prihatini, Farida