Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum Islam Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Mimbar: Media Intelektual Muslim Dan Bimbingan Rohani
St. Samsuduha
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
HIJAB DAN GENDER: TELAAH KASUS LAKI-LAKI BERHIJAB MELALUI LENSA KONSELING ISLAM DI MASJID HUBBUL WATHON MATARAM Hamzanwadi; St. Samsuduha; Hasriani, Andi
Jurnal Mimbar: Media Intelektual Muslim dan Bimbingan Rohani Vol 11 No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Islam Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47435/mimbar.v11i01.3718

Abstract

The phenomenon of men wearing the hijab has become an issue that challenges the prevailing social, cultural, and religious norms in society. In the traditional Islamic perspective, the hijab is seen as an obligation for women as a form of obedience and self-protection. However, the emergence of men wearing the hijab raises critical questions about gender identity, self-expression, and understanding of religious teachings. This study aims to examine this phenomenon through an Islamic counseling approach with a focus on the psychological, spiritual, and social aspects of the client. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach to explore the motivations, backgrounds, and inner dynamics of individuals who choose to wear the hijab as men. The results of the study indicate that the use of the hijab by men is not always related to identity deviation, but can represent a spiritual search, a form of social criticism, or an existential expression that needs to be understood holistically. The Islamic counseling approach plays an important role in providing empathetic and non-judgmental assistance, while still being based on the values ​​of the Qur'an and As-Sunnah. This study encourages the development of new insights in Islamic counseling that are more inclusive of the diversity of individual expression in the modern era.
The Position of Banggai Women in The Myth and Reality Samatan, Nuriyati; St. Samsuduha; Maryati; Robingah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v3i3.224

Abstract

The study aims to conduct an analysis of Banggai women position in the myth and reality. The social role theory was applied. A chronological approach was taken by describing events unfolding slowly following the process of time to examine the position of Banggai women in myth and reality. The method applied was qualitative with narrative, using a chronological approach across the time. The data were collected through documentation, FGD, observations and in-depth interviews. The result found that there were significant differences between Banggai women in myth and reality. In myth, Banggai women are placed in a decisive position in the family and in society, while in reality, they are in a subordinate position, comparing to men, both in the family and in society. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that women's social roles were influenced by various things. Novelty: This study used a narrative approach in analyzing the Banggai women in myth and reality
Reconstructing Marriage Dispensation Through Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah: A Child-Centered Approach to Protecting Children’s Rights St. Samsuduha; Maria Ulviani; Ahmad Mas'ari
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 2 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/pe8ckv53

Abstract

Child marriage remains a significant legal and human rights concern because it may adversely affect children’s welfare, development, education, agency, and future opportunities. In Indonesia, the strengthening of the statutory minimum marriage age through legal reform is accompanied by marriage dispensation as an exceptional mechanism, creating a need to reassess how judicial exceptions can be reconciled with substantive child protection. This research aims to reconstruct the assessment of marriage dispensation through maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah by placing children’s rights, best interests, agency, and long-term welfare at the center of judicial reasoning. The study employs normative juridical research using statutory, conceptual, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah approaches. Legal materials and relevant scholarly literature are analyzed qualitatively and descriptively-analytically to examine the relationship between marriage dispensation, child protection, potential harm, agency, power relations, and the objectives of Islamic law. The findings demonstrate that the formal availability of marriage dispensation does not by itself establish the substantive legitimacy of an exception. Marriage dispensation should remain an exceptional mechanism and should be assessed through the child’s best interests, potential physical, psychological, educational, economic, and social harm, meaningful child participation, freedom from coercive power relations, and long-term welfare and development. The study further demonstrates that maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah can function as a substantive analytical framework rather than merely as a justification for legal permissibility, by evaluating whether the expected maṣlaḥah of an exception is sufficiently justified in light of, and capable of preventing or outweighing, foreseeable mafsadah. The principal contribution of this research is the reconstruction of marriage dispensation through a child-centered maqāṣid framework that integrates genuine exceptional circumstances, best interests, harm assessment, child agency and power relations, and long-term welfare into judicial assessment. This reconstruction transforms marriage dispensation from a primarily procedural exception into a substantively justified, child-centered form of judicial reasoning.
Co-Authors Ahmad Mas'ari Hamzanwadi Hasriani, Andi Maria Ulviani Maryati Nuriyati Samatan Robingah