Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, Moch Andry
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Formulation of Cultural Values Internalization Policy by Regional Government: Efforts to Mitigate the Negative Impact of Globalization on Children Patawari, Patawari; Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, Moch Andry
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v3i4.257

Abstract

The inevitability of the rapid flow of globalization has had particularly negative implications among children, and previous research has even revealed that it has resulted in the erosion of cultural values and even the extinction of several languages. This focus examines the efforts that should be made by Regional/Regency Governments to curb the negative impacts of globalization. To answer the focus of the problem, legal-normative research methods are used, using a conceptual approach and a statutory regulatory approach. This research examines primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the authority of the Regional/Municipal Government, the government's efforts to mitigate negative impacts can be carried out by internalizing cultural values among children through drafting regional regulations regarding local content curricula containing confirmation of preparation, development, implementation and supervision.
Impoverishing Corruptors or Just a Slogan? The Disparity in Asset Confiscation Policies Between Indonesia and Singapore mannan, a reski tenripada; Tenripada Mannan, Andi Reski; Said, Muhammad Fachri; Wikra Wardhana Mamonto, Moch Andry
HORIZON PUBLIC LEGAL STUDIES Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Vol 2 No 1 (2025): Horizon Public Legal Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/3s1hsn32

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare criminal law policies related to the confiscation of assets resulting from corruption in Indonesia and Singapore, and to identify obstacles and solutions that can be implemented in Indonesia. The method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach, through a review of laws and regulations, doctrines, and legal practices in both countries. The results of the study indicate that Indonesia still faces a legal vacuum because it does not yet have a comprehensive Non-Conviction Based (NCB) Asset Forfeiture regulation, in contrast to Singapore, which has implemented it effectively through the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act (CDSA) since 1992. In addition, there are four main obstacles in Indonesia, namely the non-passage of the Asset Forfeiture Bill, the absence of a mechanism for reversing the burden of proof, regulatory fragmentation, and weak coordination between law enforcement agencies. Based on these findings, this study recommends accelerating the ratification of the Asset Forfeiture Bill, harmonizing regulations, strengthening institutional independence, and adapting best practices from Singapore into the national legal system