Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Reformasi Birokrasi Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Nafis, Muhammad Ilham Farhan; Berbudi, Muhammad Aulia; Rambe, Muhammad Naufal Fawwazi; Arteza, Muhammad Fardan; Akhiruzaman, Emiral Ardhi; Risya, Bilqis Hanifa; Yuningsih, Neneng Yani
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 2, No 5 (2024): Madani, Vol. 2, No. 5 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12580567

Abstract

Bureaucracy has an important role in realizing government functions that are correlated with fulfilling the interests of the people. Basically, the bureaucracy carries out policies that have been formulated by the institutions authorized to form these policies. This is in line with Wright's (ed., 1992) statement in Rohyatin (2021) that the bureaucracy is basically the state machine room. In the process there are challenges and changes that require bureaucratic reform with the aim of achieving good governance in responding to these challenges and changes. Indonesia and Malaysia are two countries that both have bureaucratic reform as their main agenda. This encourages a comparison of bureaucratic reform between Indonesia and Malaysia where the differences and similarities can be seen through bureaucratic reform indicators according to Putra, A. P. & Maulana, A (2022). The results show differences and similarities in bureaucratic reform between Indonesia and Malaysia.
Fungsi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Papua Dalam Pengawasan Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua Arteza, Muhammad Fardan; Farhan Nafis, Muhammad Ilham; Rambe, Muhammad Naufal Fawwazi; Berbudi, Muhammad Aulia; Akhiruzaman, Emiral Ardhi; Darmawan, Ivan
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 2, No 5 (2024): Madani, Vol. 2, No. 5 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12581181

Abstract

The Papua DPR, the legislative body in Papua, oversees the implementation of special autonomy in the country. However, the Papua Province Development Index is still below expectations, with special autonomy funds amounting to 98.395 trillion. The Papuan DPR has an important role in supervising special autonomy, with four mechanisms in place: responding to community aspirations, working meetings, working visits, and following up on results. The implementation of the Papua DPR is considered less than optimal with problems such as inadequate fund management, local elites seeking profit, and inadequate use of technology. The success of Special Autonomy for Papua depends on the performance of the DPR in supervising, managing and implementing it. The DPR must guarantee transparency, accountability, and appropriate use of funds, as well as the active participation of the Papuan people in the decision-making process. Despite receiving Special Autonomy funds amounting to IDR 1.3 trillion since 2002, the use of these funds has given rise to corruption and the legitimacy of KKN by objectifying community poverty. A comprehensive evaluation of the implementation of Special Autonomy is needed to resolve problems such as infrastructure development, education, economy and health of indigenous Papuans. Corrective action is needed to ensure the effective and efficient use of special autonomy funds and improve the welfare of the Papuan people.