Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kasta: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management LEX SUPERIOR Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora ILJS
Ferroka Putra Wathan
Universitas Kader Bangsa
Religion Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Effectiveness In Providing Consumer Protection For Online Sales And Purchase At Ecommerce Ferroka Putra Wathan
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 11 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v2i11.462

Abstract

The rise of cases of goods that do not match the image that consumers see in the marketplace shows how weak consumers are in terms of buying and selling online. However, that does not mean that sellers may sell products without following the applicable regulations. Consumers have the right to get clear information about the product they buy. So, the form of responsibility that they should give to consumers is the return of goods or a refund. It means that they will still be responsible for losses that have been received by consumers with the return procedure, but what is done by online buying and selling business actors. In this study is not in accordance with Article 19 of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection: a) Business actors in charge of compensating consumers for losses, pollution, or losses incurred as a result of consuming produced or traded goods or services; b) Pay as alluded to in section (1) might be as a discount or substitution of labor and products of the equivalent or identical worth, or clinical treatment or pay as per the arrangements of the relevant regulations; c) The payment is made within seven days of the transaction's date; d) Despite the mentions in paragraphs (1) and (2), the possibility of a criminal charge based on additional evidence indicating the existence of an element of guilt remains;
PERAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PEMBAHARUAN MASYARAKAT MENURUT DANTE Begouvic, M Eza Helyatha; Wathan, Ferroka Putra; Cuan, Bayu
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 1 No 2 (2022): JURNAL LEX SUPERIOR
Publisher : Universitas Kader Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (480.648 KB)

Abstract

Law has always been the foundation of hope for the Indonesian people to bring about justice. Justice which is one of the goals of law should be practiced in an effort to build society, not to try people in development under the pretext that we are a country of laws, the formulation of the problem in this research, namely What is the Role of Law as Community Renewal and What is Dante's Philosopher's View of the Role Law as Community Renewal, the research method uses data originating from the literature, so the results of this study are that Law in Dante's concept is not interpreted as a tool but as a means of community renewal. The main ideas that underlie this concept are that order and regularity in development and renewal efforts are desired, even considered, and that law in the sense of rules is expected to direct human activity in the direction desired by such development and renewal and according to Dante this power is evident in the form organized chart. Power in the form of an organization can be obtained based on religious legitimacy, elite ideological legitimacy, or pragmatic legitimacy based on the highest source of power or sovereignty.
Conditions Of Validity For Derogation From Data Subject Rights In Indonesian Adult Restorative Case Termination Ferry Preska Wathan; Ferroka Putra Wathan
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v5i2.4706

Abstract

Restorative settlement of adult criminal cases in Indonesia ends proceedings without conviction, yet the governing instruments require identified register entry, fix no retention limit, and leave indexation to keep the record retrievable. Restorative justice separates reparation from reintegration, and termination tests only the first, so the publicity that follows records no restorative outcome and withholds the disapproval-withdrawal reintegration requires. It also operates as the functional equivalent of an additional penalty upon persons never convicted, exposure statute withholds from children but not adults. Because restrictions on data subject rights fall under a statutory reservation in Law No. 27 of 2022 and the 1945 Constitution, the question is one of form. It asks what a valid derogation requires, how the instruments qualify against delegation, and what redress remains. The study is doctrinal, resting on primary legal materials and documented practice. Three cumulative conditions govern derogation. Necessity is indexed to an active process and expires at closure, when retention keeps a basis, access a narrower one, publication none. The openness statute reaches the terminating instrument, not the identifiers of the person named in it. The instruments do not purport to derogate, and read as though they did satisfy neither branch of the statutory test, so a derogation resting on them is defective. Because redress requires the exposed person to disclose the identity at issue, defect and paralysis are one problem. The response lies in a statutory basis, anonymisation by default, closed retention allowing verification of eligibility, and determined access.
Menilai Tanpa Kendali: Atribusi Kewajiban Pemerintah Daerah Atas Determinan Pengungkapan Pencurian dengan Pemberatan Ferroka Putra Wathan; Galih Andi Prabowo; Supriyedi
Bahasa Indonesia Vol 11 No 2 (2026): Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Pangeran Diponegoro Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53429/iljs.v11i2.2824

Abstract

This study maps the determinants that actually shape the clearance of aggravated theft cases and establishes their legal position and its consequences for the validity of imposing performance assessment upon the police. It is empirical legal research reinforced by normative analysis through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, taking the jurisdiction of Kepolisian Sektor Seberang Ulu I in Palembang from 2023 to 2025 as its locus, which recorded 303 reports and an aggregate clearance figure of 31.02 percent. Environmental observation notes and a matched pair of case illustrations serve as primary evidence, while statements from five informants serve as corroboration only, four of them being police officers. The discussion yields a determinant map that is mixed yet asymmetric: case processing, response speed, and the quality of scene sterilization lie within investigator control, whereas the supply of environmental evidentiary traces, namely lighting, cameras, and witnesses, lies outside it. Three competing characterizations are tested: internal police constraints explain processing but not evidence supply, the primacy of self-organized security proves conditioned by spatial visibility, and socio-economic factors explain crime occurrence but not case clearance. The obligation over the conditions supplying evidentiary traces attaches to Pemerintah Daerah as a mandatory governmental affair relating to basic services, is measurable through technical road standards and fiscal monitoring, not minimum service standards, and carries earmarked financing with a route of consequence, its level of fulfilment at the locus being left unassessed. The novelty lies in shifting the unit of performance analysis from a single organ to the linkage between organs through the boundary of authority. It concludes that the validity of clearance figures as a performance indicator diminishes insofar as their determinants lie beyond the control of the assessed organ, and proposes separating effort from effect as das Sollen and de lege ferenda without reducing police procedural obligations.
Representational Completeness: A Legal Test for Performance Information Instruments, Applied to Police Records in Indonesia Ferroka Putra Wathan; Didi Jhondiani; Rafsandi Dimbara
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni: Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3232

Abstract

Article 19A(1) of Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2026 makes police performance accountability a statutory duty, requiring professionalism, proportionality, transparency, and accountability. Although this duty is implemented through reporting instruments, no legal standard defines when such instruments are insufficient. This article addresses that gap by constructing a doctrinal benchmark. Three criteria of representational completeness—functional, temporal, and structural—are derived from the duty of due care in Article 10(1)(d) of Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014, three components of Peraturan Presiden Nomor 29 Tahun 2014, and three administrative court rulings restated as duties of office. Each criterion is operationalized through an indicator observable directly from the reporting instrument. The framework is tested doctrinally and empirically using crime and clearance records from one district police command and two subordinate sector commands in South Sumatra (2022–2025), supported by eight service-chain interviews. The assessment targets the reporting instrument rather than organizational performance. All three indicators reveal deficiencies: no field links crime records with the preventive-work reporting regime; 139 offences recorded over ten months are presented as annual figures without distinguishing absent events from absent entries; and subordinate totals exceed superordinate totals (51 versus 43; 10 versus 3) without any statement of reporting scope. As these deficiencies arise from the reporting artefact itself, additional personnel or funding cannot resolve them. The appropriate remedy is regulatory anchoring de lege lata, and the criteria are transferable to any public agency reporting through aggregate data.
Due Care as Preventive Legal Protection for Third Parties in Digital Access Termination Ferroka Putra Wathan
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3869

Abstract

Otoritas Indonesia menghentikan akses ke platform digital untuk menghapus konten ilegal dan memberikan sanksi kepada operator sistem elektronik yang belum mendaftar. Ketika sanksi semacam itu berlaku di tingkat domain, seperti dalam penghentian Juli 2022 yang ditinjau dalam Keputusan 424/G/TF/2022/PTUN. JKT, efeknya mencapai pengguna yang bukan subjek pelanggaran maupun penerimanya. Artikel ini menanyakan mengapa perlindungan hukum represif melalui klaim tindakan ilegal terhadap badan pemerintah secara struktural dibatasi bagi pihak ketiga, dan bagaimana kehati-hatian dapat dibangun dalam perlindungan pencegahan untuk tindakan administratif berbantuan sistem. Dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan statutori, konseptual, dan kasus, studi ini mengukur jalur represif terhadap tiga indikator kontestabilitas yang dibaca dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 2014, dan menemukan tidak ada yang terpenuhi. Dua tidak dapat disediakan oleh pejabat yang memutuskan kasus: batas kompensasi yang ditetapkan pada tahun 1991, dan cara koersif dalam Pasal 116 Undang-Undang Nomor 51 tahun 2009, yang tidak dapat digunakan karena peraturan yang didelegasikan tidak pernah diterbitkan. Kemudian ia membangun dua komponen kehati-hatian yang layak dari Pasal 10 ayat (1) huruf d dan penjelasannya, yaitu tinjauan manusia yang bermakna dan mitigasi dampak sampingan terhadap pihak ketiga, masing-masing membawa indikator dokumenter yang dapat dipenuhi oleh pejabat dan uji pengadilan
Co-Authors Cuan, Bayu Didi Jhondiani Ferry Preska Wathan Galih Andi Prabowo M. Eza Helyatha Begouvic Rafsandi Dimbara Supriyedi