Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Dimensi Etik dan Hukum Tindakan Kedokteran pada Pelayananan Kesehatan oleh Mahasiswa Profesi Dokter Gigi (Studi Kasus Rumah Sakit Islam Gigi dan Mulut Sultan Agung Semarang) Gresfullah, Akhmad Zaida; Purwoko, Joko; Nugroho, Hari Pudjo
Soepra Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Vol 9, No 2: Desember 2023, Terakreditasi Nasional Peringkat 3
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24167/sjhk.v9i2.5808

Abstract

Abstrak: Mahasiswa profesi dokter gigi adalah seseorang mahasiswa yang sedang melaksanakan pendidikan profesi setelah menyelesaikan pendidikan akademik. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 29 tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran, mahasiswa profesi dokter dan dokter gigi masih belum diperbolehkan untuk memberikan pelayanan kesehatan karena belum memiliki STR dan SIP. Mahasiswa profesi dokter gigi dalam memberikan pelayanan kesehatan dengan tujuan pembelajaran klinik tetap harus memperhatikan hukum kesehatan dan kode etik kedokteran gigi.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan yang cukup berarti dari mahasiswa profesi dokter gigi di RSIGM SA dalam memahami pengetahuan etik dan hukum kesehatan. Adanya hubungan hukum yang terjadi antara mahasiswa profesi dokter gigi dan dosen/DPJP yaitu adanya pelimpahan wewenang yang diberikan oleh dosen/DPJP untuk dapat melakukan pelayanan kepada pasien yaitu berupa mandat dan tetap dibawah pengawasan serta instruksi dari dosen/DPJP. Mahasiswa profesi dokter gigi masih banyak yang abai terhadap tanggung jawab etik dan hukum,. RSIGM SA telah memberikan upaya perlindungan hukum bagi mahasiswa profesi dokter gigi yaitu berupa perlindungan hukum preventif dan represif.Kata kunci: mahasiswa profesi dokter gigi, etik kesehatan, hukum kesehatan Abstract: A dental co-assistant is a student who is carrying out professional education after completing academic education. Based on Law No. 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice, dental co-assistants are still not allowed to provide health services because they do not have STR and SIP. A dental co-assistant while providing health services with the aim of clinical learning must still pay attention to health law and the code of ethics of dentistry. The results showed that the dental co-assistant at RSIGM SA had a significant difference in understanding knowledge of ethics and health law. The legal relationship that happens between dental co-assistant and lecturers/dentist is delegation of authority given by lecturers/dentist to be able to perform services to patients in the form of a mandate and remain under the supervision and instruction of lecturers/dentist. Many dental co-assistants are still ignorant of ethical and legal responsibilities. RSIGM SA has provided legal protection for dental co-assistants, that is preventive and repressive legal protectionKeywords: dental co-assistant, ethics, health law
Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis After Tooth Extraction Associated with Dry Socket: A Clinical Case Report Gresfullah, Akhmad Zaida; Wulandari, Febriyani Ayu
Jurnal Medali Vol 8, No 1 (2026): Media Dental Intelektual February 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/medali.8.1.39-45

Abstract

AbstractBackground: Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) is a sinus infection of dental origin, commonly associated with extraction of maxillary posterior teeth. While alveolar osteitis (dry socket) is a common post-extraction complication, its progression to OMS is relatively low, though clinically observed. This case report discussed the management of OMS, for the general practitioner to collaborating with otorhinolaryngologist and eliminating the focal infection with non-surgical management.Case: A 28-year-old female presented with severe pain, foul-smelling odor, facial discomfort, and postnasal drip following extraction of the upper left maxillary molar (tooth 26). Clinical examination revealed dry socket, while panoramic radiography suggested sinusitis involvement. Multidisciplinary management, such as saline irrigation, antibiotic therapy, and nasal decongestant under otorhinolaryngologist supervision and for the focal infection included local debridement and curettage without any dressing following with maintaining good oral hygiene. After 12 days, significant symptom improvement was observed, both clinical and radiographic evaluations confirmed complete resolution at three months follow-up. Conclusion: OMS associated with dry socket is relatively low but can be effectively managed with non-surgical multidisciplinary management. Good healing following extraction to eliminate the focal infection is fundamental. Ensuring a favorable prognosis further requires accurate diagnosis, appropriate pharmacological therapy, effective dental focal management, and comprehensive patient education