Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ta`'zir bi Ihlakil Mal Dalam Perspektif Wahbah Zuhayli: Suatu Analisis Terhadap Kitab Fiqh Islam wa Adillatuh Jufri Yahya; Nazaruddin Nazaruddin; Abdurrazak Abdurrazak
Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Siyasah wa Qanuniyah
Publisher : Ma'had Aly Raudhatul Ma'arif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61842/swq/v1i2.14

Abstract

This study, titled Ta’zir bi Ihlakil Mal According to Wahbah Zuhayli in the Book of Fiqh al-Islamiah wa Adillatuh in the Chapter on Ta’zir, aims to foster a peaceful, orderly, obedient, and consistent life in accordance with religious teachings, while avoiding conflicts, disputes, and bloodshed. To achieve this, Allah SWT has set specific laws and promises rewards for obedience, along with punishments for disobedience. The research focuses on two main issues: 1) What is the legal stance on ta’zir bi ihlakil mal according to Wahbah Zuhayli in Fiqh al-Islamiah wa Adillatuh in the chapter on ta’zir? and 2) What is the relevance of implementing ta’zir bi ihlakil mal in modern society according to the book? This study uses a qualitative research method with a normative legal approach. The findings conclude that, according to the majority of scholars from the Maliki, Hanbali, and other schools of thought, the punishment of ta’zir bi ihlakil mal is permissible under Islamic law, and wealth can be destroyed if it becomes a means of causing corruption. Additionally, ta’zir remains relevant in modern times as it is part of the Maqashid Syar'iyyah, just like other Islamic laws.
Ta’zir Terhadap Pencurian di Bawah Nisab Dalam Fiqh Jinayah Menurut Imam Al-Nawawi Ahmadul Abrar; Jufri Yahya
Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Siyasah Wa Qanuniyah
Publisher : Ma'had Aly Raudhatul Ma'arif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61842/swq/v2i2.27

Abstract

Theft that necessitates the hudud punishment is theft that has reached a specific minimum threshold, known as nisab. In contrast, for cases of theft that do not reach the nisab threshold, the hudud punishment is not applied; instead, the perpetrator is subjected to ta’zir punishment. Based on the background of the issue, the researcher identified two main research questions: (1) What are the criteria for theft below the nisab that are subject to ta’zir punishment according to Imam al-Nawawi? (2) How is the implementation of ta’zir punishment for theft below the nisab carried out according to Imam al-Nawawi? This study employs a qualitative approach with a documentation method that utilizes documents as the primary source for obtaining information relevant to the research and uses content analysis as the data analysis technique. The research results indicate that (1) Imam al-Nawawi explains specific criteria for both the thief and the stolen goods. For the thief, Imam al-Nawawi states that the thief must be of legal age (baligh), commit the theft voluntarily, have received Islamic teachings, and be under Islamic law jurisdiction. Regarding the stolen goods, this study focuses on the nisab threshold, which is ¼ dinar or 3 dirhams, equivalent in modern terms to approximately 1.0625 grams of gold. (2) As for the implementation of ta’zir punishment for theft below the nisab, according to Imam al-Nawawi, it includes imprisonment for a duration determined by the ruler, lashes, slaps, and reprimands. It is important to emphasize that the punishment must not be excessively severe (ghairu mubarrih).