Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia
Prayitno, Eko Edy
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Disparitas Implementasi Dana Bagi Hasil Cukai Tembakau (DBH-CHT) Terhadap Program Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Daerah Prayitno, Eko Edy
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Vol 10, No 1 (2024): Published Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jhmj.v10i1.4128

Abstract

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa aturan dan kebijakan mengenai Dana Bagi Hasil Cukai Tembakau, yakni sebagai bagian dari pelaksanaan kebijakan desentralisasi sistem pemerintahan atau otonomi daerah, Untuk menjawab isu hukum yang dikaji digunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan per Undang-Undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Data yang digunakan adalah data skunder yang diperoleh melalui penelusuran literatur. Analisa menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menegaskan bahwa kewenangan pengelolaan Dana Bagi Hasil Cukai Tembakau dilimpahkan kepada para gubernur dari provinsi penerima dan disinyalir menimbulkan persoalan tersendiri di bidang hukum administrasi negara. AbstractThis study aims to analyze the rules and policies regarding the Tobacco Excise Revenue Sharing Fund, which is part of the implementation of the decentralization policy of the government system or regional autonomy, to answer the legal issues studied, a normative legal research method is used with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The data used is secondary data obtained through literature searches. Analysis using qualitative methods. The results of the study confirm that the authority to manage the Tobacco Excise Revenue Sharing Fund is delegated to the governors of the recipient provinces and allegedly raises its own problems in the field of state administrative law.
Co-Authors