Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS KESENGAJAAN DALAM BENTUK TINDAK PIDANA MEMBUAT SURAT PALSU (PUTUSAN NO.61/PID.B/2022/PN JAKARTA SELATAN) : Analysis Of Deliberation In The Form Of Criminal Act Of Formulating Fake Letters (Decision No.61/Pid.B/2022/Pn Jakarta Selatan) Rigo Ijaprana Purba; Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.20337

Abstract

This research relates to decision No. 61/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt Sel. The chronology of which in this decision the defendant named Fiky Mukiandhany who was an accomplice in the crime of forgery of letters. This legal scientific work discusses issues related to how deliberate the perpetrator of the crime of making a fake letter (Decision No. 61/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt Sel) and whether deliberate intent in the crime of making a fake letter in Decision No. 61/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt Sel is an excuse for criminal erasure. This investigate may be a regulating and graphic legitimate inquire about utilizing auxiliary information gotten through writing ponder, the information is handled subjectively and the conclusion is drawn utilizing deductive rationale. Based on the comes about of the inquire about, it is found that the deliberately committed by the culprit of the wrongdoing of making a fake letter in Decision No. 61/Pid.B/PN Jkt Sel is purposefulness within the shape of confusion or botch, namely Misdirection of Facts (feitelijke dwaling).
PENJATUHAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA DUMPING LIMBAH B3 (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 164/PID.SUS/PN SDA): Imposition Of Criminal Sanctions On Perpetrators Of Hazardous Waste (B3) Dumping Crimes (Case Study Of Decision Number 164/Pid.Sus/Pn Sda) Muhammad Renaldy Lapaso; Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i2.23027

Abstract

Environmental damage has become a global issue with widespread impacts, one of which is caused by the illegal disposal of hazardous and toxic (B3) waste. Strict regulations are necessary to enforce sanctions against perpetrators of B3 waste dumping. However, in practice, there are cases where the enforcement of sanctions does not align with the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UU PPLH), as seen in Decision Number 164/PID.SUS/2023/PN SDA. This study examines the provisions of criminal sanctions for B3 waste dumping offenders under Article 104 of the UU PPLH and the fulfillment of special conditions in probationary sentences. Using a normative legal method with a descriptive approach, the findings result and the conclusion indicate that the imposed sanctions were not proportional to the environmental damage caused. According to B3 expert Muhammad Atjemain, such actions have the potential to cause severe and long-term environmental harm. Furthermore, the court did not impose the special conditions required for probation under Article 14c of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), including the obligation to compensate for environmental damage.
ANALISIS INDETIFIKASI TEORI USAHA DAGANG SEBAGAI KORPORASI DALAM KASUS ILLEGAL LOGGING (STUDI TINDAK PIDANA PENGADILAN NOMOR 12/Pid.SUS-LH/2021/PN.KSN): Analysis theoretical identification trading businesses as corporations in illegal logging (Study of Criminal Act Decision No. 12/Pid.SUS LH/2021/PN.KSN) Muhamad Akbar Asanudin; Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i2.22779

Abstract

Environmental crimes involving corporations in Indonesia can lead to deforestation with physical and economic impacts, such as in the case of Illegal Logging. These actions violate legal provisions stated in Law Number 18 of 2013. For example, in 2020, in the village of Tumbang Tiran, the business entity Unit Dagang Karya Abadi, represented by Ripansyah as the Owner/Responsible Party, was found guilty of committing an Illegal Logging crime that violated Article 83 Paragraph (4) letter a in conjunction with Article 12 letter d of Law Number 18 of 2013. The issue raised in this article is the role of business enterprises or corporations in Illegal Logging cases (based on the Cassation Decision of the Kasongan District Court Number 12/Pid.Sus-Lh/2021/Pn.Ksn), and the corporate responsibility for such environmental crimes. This study uses a normative juridical approach, analyzing primary and secondary legal sources. This research is descriptive, with data analyzed qualitatively, and using deductive reasoning to draw conclusions. The results and conclusions, based on Article 1 Paragraph 22 of Law Number 18 of 2013, categorize Unit Dagang Karya Abadi as a corporate legal subject that can be held accountable for environmental crimes.
TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN PENGARUH DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Rostislav Farin La Unsu; Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 4 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v7i4.23514

Abstract

Perdagangan Pengaruh (Trading in Influence) adalah salah satu jenis tindak pidana korupsi sebagaimana tercantum dalam United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). Pasal 18 UNCAC menegaskan pentingnya kriminalisasi perdagangan pengaruh untuk menjaga integritas sistem hukum di negara-negara anggotanya. Namun, meskipun Indonesia telah meratifikasi UNCAC melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006, belum memiliki ketentuan khusus yang mengatur perdagangan pengaruh dalam kerangka hukum nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keabsahan tindakan perdagangan pengaruh berdasarkan UNCAC dan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, studi kasus pada putusan pengadilan terkait, serta analisis dokumen hukum lainnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan perdagangan pengaruh tidak hanya melanggar hukum, tetapi juga menimbulkan dampak serius, seperti menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum, dan mengurangi kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap integritas institusi publik. Oleh karena itu, Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi perlu merumuskan pasal mengenai Tindak Pidana Pengaruh.
TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN DENGAN SENGAJA MENYEBABKAN CEDERA BERAT (PUTUSAN NOMOR 561/PID.B/2021/PN.SBY): The Crime Of Torture With Intentional Cause Serious Injury (Desicion Number  561/Pid.B/2021/PN.Sby) Syach Zaky Sultan; Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24682

Abstract

The crime of assault perpetrated by the perpetrator against the victim has involved violent behavior that can cause various types of physical injuries to the victim. However, the victim may also experience serious psychological impacts due to the violence they have endured. The identification issues raised are: what are the criteria for intentional assault causing serious injury in Decision Number 561/Pid.B/2021/PN. Sby, and does the perpetrator's action of intentionally causing serious injury meet the qualifications of Article 351 Paragraph (2) in Decision Number 561/Pid.B/2021/PN.Sby. This research employs a normative research method with descriptive-analytical characteristics, utilizing both primary and secondary data obtained through literature review and analyzed qualitatively using deductive logical conclusion drawing. The research findings conclude that the defendant's actions have caused severe injuries to the victim by the criteria of Article 90 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), which involves conditions of illness or injuries that do not provide hope for recovery or even result in death and there is appropriateness of the punishment and criminal sanctions given in this case. In the researcher's view, the charges that should have been brought forth are based on Article 351 Paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) because the injuries suffered by the victim fall into the category of severe assault.
Co-Authors Muhamad Akbar Asanudin Muhammad Renaldy Lapaso Rigo Ijaprana Purba Rostislav Farin La Unsu Syach Zaky Sultan