Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Hukum atas Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Kasus Pembebasan Lahan oleh Pemprov DKI Yang Berlawanan dengan AAUPB dan Undang-Undang Djoen, The Mei; Boediningsih, Widyawati
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v4i4.1436

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis tinjauan hukum atas keputusan tata usaha negara terkait kasus pembebasan lahan yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta yang diduga bertentangan dengan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik (AAUPB) dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keputusan tata usaha negara dalam kasus ini tidak hanya melanggar beberapa prinsip AAUPB seperti prinsip kepastian hukum, akuntabilitas, dan transparansi, tetapi juga bertentangan dengan undang-undang yang mengatur proses pembebasan lahan. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya penerapan AAUPB dan kepatuhan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dalam setiap keputusan tata usaha negara untuk menghindari kerugian bagi masyarakat dan memastikan keadilan
The Application of Justice Principles in Sentencing Criminal Sanctions for Defamation Convicts Through Electronic Media Djoen, The Mei; Tanudjaja, Tanudjaja
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Regular Issue: July-September 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v4i4.902

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology and social media in Indonesia has transformed the landscape of public interaction and expression. However, this progress is accompanied by a significant increase in defamation cases through electronic media, creating complex challenges for law enforcement and the application of the principle of justice. This research aims to analyze the application of justice principles and the effectiveness of legal remedies in imposing criminal sanctions against convicted individuals for defamation through electronic media, based on five court decisions in Indonesia. The issues examined include: (1) how justice principles are applied in criminal verdicts for defamation cases through electronic media; and (2) to what extent legal remedies are effective in addressing sentencing disparities in cases with similar legal elements. The research method used is normative juridical, with a case and statutory approach. The findings reveal significant variation in the application of justice by judges, ranging from imprisonment to suspended sentences, depending on judicial sensitivity to social context and understanding of freedom of expression. On the other hand, the effectiveness of legal remedies is generally weak, especially in cases brought to the Supreme Court, where substantive legal arguments are not accommodated. The study recommends reform in cybercriminal law and the development of sentencing guidelines specifically for Electronic Information and Transaction Law-related offenses. The research analyzed five court decisions showing disparities in criminal sanctions despite similar legal elements, indicating inconsistent application of legal certainty and justice principles that should serve as the foundation of criminal law.