Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Hikam Hulwanullah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dilema Birokrasi Penegakan Hukum di Era Digital: Konflik Due Process of Law dan Tekanan Opini Publik dalam Kebijakan Polri Sinaga, Intan Virgynia Silvy; Hikam Hulwanullah
Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Indo Global Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36982/jpp.v10i4.6089

Abstract

Fenomena “No Viral, No Justice” menggambarkan ketimpangan antara prinsip keadilan prosedural (Due Process of Law) dan praktik penegakan hukum oleh Polri yang kerap dipengaruhi tekanan publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan prinsip Due Process of Law dalam sistem hukum Indonesia serta implikasinya terhadap praktik penegakan hukum di era viralitas kasus. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun prinsip Due Process of Law telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, KUHAP, UU HAM, dan UU Kepolisian, penerapannya masih lemah akibat rendahnya pengawasan internal dan kuatnya pengaruh media sosial terhadap arah penyidikan. Kontribusi teoritis studi ini adalah perumusan kerangka dialektika ganda yang menempatkan Due Process of Law sebagai variabel kontrol normatif yang berkonflik dengan Teori Responsivitas Birokrasi. Karena itu, diperlukan penguatan akuntabilitas, profesionalitas aparat, dan edukasi hukum kepada masyarakat agar keadilan ditegakkan berdasarkan hukum, bukan tekanan opini publik.
THE PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THROUGH THE PRACTICE OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Hikam Hulwanullah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 2 No. 6 (2022): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v2i6.1239

Abstract

According to the democracy index, Indonesia is a flawed democracy, meaning that, as the state's organ of governance, the government is still insufficiently powerful to effectively defend the fundamental rights of its people. One of the causes of this is the inadequate legal system and protection of citizens' fundamental rights from the state, which is essentially achieved through the practice of judicial activism at the Constitutional Court. This study utilizes normative research to examine written regulations' norms to provide findings about the pressing need to address the practice of judicial activism at the Constitutional Court. This study utilized three distinct sorts of approaches: the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative approach. Moreover, relevant primary, secondary, and tertiary legal documents serve as the foundation for this study. After gathering this legal data through a review of the literature, qualitative descriptive and comparative descriptive analytic methodologies were used for analysis. The author found that judicial activism is one of the steps that judges can take to make efforts to protect the constitutional rights of citizens in the constitutional court.
Co-Authors Sinaga, Intan Virgynia Silvy