Windajani, E. Imma Indra Dewi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Phishing Victims : Reviewed from Indonesian Positive Law Putri, Olivia Audriana; Windajani, E. Imma Indra Dewi
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1178

Abstract

In this age of digitalization, phishing has become a crime that is close to human life. In phishing crimes, the perpetrator's identity is mostly unknown or anonymous. The perpetrator's identity is the primary key for processing a lawsuit in court. Victims who don’t know the real identity of the phisher will not be able to file a lawsuit for compensation. This study aims to determine the legal protection the state provides to phishing victims, especially in terms of compensation. This research uses a juridical-normative method with data collection through a literature study. Law No. 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008 regarding Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Law No. 27 of 2022 regarding Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), and other constitutional regulations are the primary legal materials in this research. The secondary legal materials are relevant research results, journals, and books. Based on the research conducted, it has been shown that it’s necessary to establish the real identity of the perpetrator who can be responsible for compensating the victims of phishing. The difficulty of finding phishers who can hide their real identities and digital footprints are the main obstacle to compensating phishing victims.
Obligation to Use Rupiah in Business Transactions in Indonesia Indrawati, Etty; Windajani, E. Imma Indra Dewi; Kastowo, C.; Shalom, Efraim Yehuda
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1216

Abstract

The Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia as an independent and sovereign country, has a currency as a symbol of state sovereignty that must be respected and proud of by all Indonesian citizens. The rupiah is the currency of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia which applies as a mandatory and legal payment instrument in the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. However, there are areas in Indonesia that do not use Indonesian currency (Rupiah) as the main instrument of business transactions, especially in the border area between Indonesia and Malaysia. This raises the issue of the circulation of foreign currency as a tool for business transactions in the territory of Indonesia, which in turn creates competition between Rupiah and Ringgit in the economic circulation of the community in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to determine the preventive and repressive efforts that can be made by the Indonesian government and Bank Indonesia to minimize violations of the use of foreign currencies in the territory of Indonesia, as regulated in Law Number 7 of 2011 concerning Currencies and Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 17/3/PBI/2015 concerning Obligations to Use Rupiah in the Territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This research is normative legal research through library research by tracing secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, using documentation methods and instruments in the form of document studies. Then, the data were analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of this research indicate that some preventive efforts can be made by the government and Bank Indonesia. The first is strengthening juridical instruments by the Government and Bank Indonesia. The second is the government together with Bank Indonesia must carry out a socialization and education movement related to the obligation to use Rupiah currency. The third is the government must build economic infrastructure facilities. The fourth is the government and Bank Indonesia can encourage the public to use Rupiah currency in electronic and digital forms. In this research, repressive efforts are not needed, because they can be resolved with preventive efforts, except in certain offenses that threaten the country's economic turnover or endanger the existence of the Rupiah currency on a massive scale.
Analysis of Cross-Border Trade Between Countries: Normative Study Between Indonesia and Countries with Direct Land Borders Windajani, E. Imma Indra Dewi; Indrawati, Etty; Putri, Koleta Donna Indhayana
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1218

Abstract

Based on Government Regulation Number 34 Year of 2019 on Border Trade, economic transactions in cross-border trade are permitted with certain restrictions. These limitations include the type of goods, the quantity of purchases, and the trading system of trade goods. The types and maximum purchase limits are regulated in the bilateral Border Trade Agreement (BTA) and Border Crossing Agreement (BCA). In practice, transactions exceed the limits of transaction value specified in bilateral agreements and governing laws and regulations, causing losses to the state. There are two purposes of this research. The first is to explore and analyze the factors causing irregularities in cross-border trade transactions and the second is to explore the efforts to minimize them. This research is normative legal research through library research by tracing secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, using documentation methods and instruments in the form of document studies. Then, data were analyzed using qualitative analysis. There are two results of this research. The first is four factors that cause deviations in cross-border trade transactions, including economic factors, infrastructure factors, and juridical factors. The second is the efforts that can be made to minimize deviations in cross-border trade transactions including preemptive efforts in the form of instilling good values that are internalized into a person, preventive efforts in the form of preventive actions, and repressive efforts in the form of law enforcement actions.