Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Journal Equity of Law and Governance ULJLS
Robert
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Aspects of Creative Economic Development in Digital Economic Development in Padangsidempuan Mochtar Indra Efendi Siregar; Detania Sukarja; Robert
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 4 No. 2
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/elg.4.2.10103.366-375

Abstract

Legal aspects of creative economic development in digital economic development by conducting studies in Padangsidempuan City, is important to carry out with the following considerations: There are limitations in terms of legal regulations that both the central government and the regional government of Padangsidempuan City have in supporting the development of the creative economy in digital economic development, so that the implementation of digital economic development in the regions has not run optimally. This research analyzes the legal aspects of developing a digital-based creative economy, the role of local governments in supporting it based on positive laws in Indonesia, as well as the obstacles and the role of the Padangsidempuan City Government in overcoming them. Using a normative juridical method with primary, secondary, literature and field study data, the research concludes that integrated legal support, collaboration between the government and creative economy actors in strategic steps are key to the growth of the digital creative economy in Indonesia, while Padangsidempuan needs to overcome limitations in digital infrastructure, creative education, regulatory harmonization, and intellectual property rights protection. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a strategy for a collaborative model of academia, business and government, or what is called the Triple Helix.
PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA DALAM PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN OLEH KREDITUR YANG TIDAK MEMBERIKAN HAK SUARA DALAM RAPAT PERJANJIAN HOMOLOGASI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 49 K/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2025) Viely Yautarin Br Surbakti; Detania Sukarja; Robert
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 2, Juni 2026 Release
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.48678

Abstract

This study is motivated by the differing legal interpretations between the Commercial Court and the Supreme Court regarding the application of the principle of simple proof in cases involving a creditor’s petition to annul a settlement agreement where the creditor did not exercise their voting rights at the homologation meeting as addressed in Decision No. 49 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025. The research issues include the legal provisions on the annulment of a settlement agreement under the PKPU, the application of the principle of simple proof, and the judges’ reasoning in the decision. This study aims to analyze the applicable legal provisions, the application of the principle of simple proof, and the judges’ reasoning in the case. The research method used is a normative legal approach employing statutory analysis and case-based analysis through a literature review. The results indicate that a homologated settlement agreement is binding on all creditors, including those who did not exercise their right to vote. The right to file for annulment of the settlement remains possible if the debtor fails to fulfill the terms of the settlement in accordance with Article 170(1) of the UUK-PKPU. The application of the principle of simple proof should focus on the existence of two or more creditors and the existence of debts that have matured and are collectible, rather than on creditor participation in the homologation meeting. This study concludes that consistent application of the principle of simplified proof is necessary to ensure legal certainty and fair protection for all creditors.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF CRYPTOCURRENCY (CRYPTO ASSETS) AS A MEANS OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND ITS HANDLING BASED ON THE REGULATIONS OF THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING SUPERVISORY AGENCY (BAPPEBTI) NO.5 AND NO.6 OF 2019 Achmad Kamal Mansur Siregar; Sunarmi; Robert
Ultimate Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Development of Legal Science
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of financial technology has given rise to Cryptocurrency as a popular form of digital asset in various parts of the world, including Indonesia. Its decentralized nature, high anonymity, and ease of cross-border transactions make Cryptocurrency an instrument vulnerable to misuse, including as a means of money laundering (TPPU). This study aims to: (1) analyze the legal provisions governing the prohibition of Cryptocurrency as a means of money laundering; (2) assess the extent to which Indonesian positive law, specifically BAPPEBTI Regulation No. 5 of 2019 and BAPPEBTI Regulation No. 6 of 2019, is adequate in preventing crypto misuse; and (3) identify strategies for prevention, supervision, and enforcement against crypto-based money laundering practices in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a juridical-descriptive approach. The research data was obtained from primary legal materials in the form of laws and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of legal literature, scientific journals, official agency reports, and actual case studies. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by interpreting and examining the alignment between legal norms and field practices. The results show that although BAPPEBTI Regulations No. 5 and No. 6 of 2019 provide a legal basis for regulating the trading of crypto assets as digital commodities, these regulations still focus more on the technical aspects of trading and asset registration, rather than on preventing money laundering. This indicates that national legal instruments still have weaknesses in terms of enforcement, inter-agency coordination, human resource capacity, and international cooperation.
Co-Authors Achmad Kamal Mansur Siregar Mochtar Indra Efendi Siregar Sukarja, Detania Sunarmi Viely Yautarin Br Surbakti