Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Journal of Social Humanities and Education: Scripta Humanika
Achmad Nurwachid
Universitas 45 Surabaya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kepastian Hukum Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja karena Efisiensi Perusahaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Cipta Kerja Achmad Nurwachid; Deki Satriawan; Hery Kurniawan Zaenal; Yudhistira Prawira Utama; Marco Orias
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan Vol 1 No 2 (2025): November: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan: Scripta Humanika
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/vpva8t20

Abstract

Termination of employment (PHK) due to company efficiency poses significant legal and social challenges in Indonesia, especially after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation. This study uses a normative juridical approach to analyze legal provisions, court decisions, and legal literature related to efficiency-based PHK, with a systematic and teleological interpretative framework. The results of the analysis show that although the Job Creation Law stipulates procedures and normative rights for workers through Articles 161–165, there are normative and implementative gaps that cause legal uncertainty, social conflict, and the risk of procedural injustice for workers. The socio-legal study shows that the effectiveness of legal norms depends not only on formal compliance by companies, but also on the integration of norms, practices, and the socio-economic conditions of workers. These findings emphasize the need for participatory mediation mechanisms, procedural transparency, and consistent protection of normative rights to strengthen legal certainty and social justice in the practice of efficiency-based termination. This research provides theoretical and practical contributions to the development of labor laws that are responsive to social dynamics.
Eksistensi Bukti Digital Ephemeral Message dalam Pembuktian Pidana: Problematika Keabsahan Pembuktian pada Platform Pesan Instan Yudhistira Prawira Utama; Marco Orias; Deki Satriawan; Hery Kurniawan Zaenal; Achmad Nurwachid
Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/populer.v5i1.4410

Abstract

The development of instant messaging platforms equipped with ephemeral message features has created new challenges within Indonesia’s criminal evidence system, particularly regarding the admissibility and probative value of digital evidence that is automatically deleted and does not always leave verifiable forensic traces. The increasing use of such communication technologies raises legal concerns because digital information that disappears after a certain period may be relevant in criminal investigations and judicial proceedings. This condition creates legal uncertainty, as the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) do not explicitly regulate evidentiary standards for transient digital evidence. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches through the analysis of relevant primary and secondary legal materials. The findings indicate that the admissibility of ephemeral message evidence largely depends on judicial interpretation and the availability of supporting derivative evidence, including screenshots, metadata, and digital forensic outputs. However, its evidentiary strength remains limited because such evidence often lacks complete authenticity, integrity, and traceability, which are essential elements in assessing the reliability of digital evidence. These limitations create juridical challenges throughout the criminal justice process, from investigation and prosecution to judicial examination and final judgment. Therefore, stronger regulatory frameworks, clearer legal standards, and more comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of digital evidence are needed to ensure legal certainty, consistency, and fairness in handling criminal cases involving ephemeral digital communications.
Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Hak Penguasaan atas Ruang Laut dalam Perspektif Hukum Agraria dan Hukum Kelautan di Indonesia Hery Kurniawan Zaenal; Achmad Nurwachid; Yudhistira Prawira Utama; Marco Orias; Deki Satriawan
Populer: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa
Publisher : Universitas Maritim AMNI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58192/populer.v5i1.4411

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the regulation of rights to control maritime space from an integrative perspective of agrarian law and maritime law in Indonesia, amidst the growing practice of privatizing coastal and maritime areas through administrative land instruments and permits for the use of maritime space. The study employs a non-empirical legal methodology using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a legal harmonization approach through an analysis of the Land Law (UUPA), the Maritime Law, coastal zone regulations, Constitutional Court rulings, as well as the doctrines of agrarian law and marine governance. The research findings indicate that the national legal system still suffers from normative disharmony regarding the legal status of maritime space due to the unclear relationship between the state’s sovereign rights, administrative utilization rights, and private property rights. The practice of granting exclusive rights over maritime space has been shown to contradict the principle of the public domain, the social function of agrarian resources, and the protection of coastal communities’ rights. Legal reconstruction is necessary through a public trusteeship model that positions the state as the steward of public interests with strict limitations on the privatization of maritime space to achieve maritime agrarian justice and national ecological sustainability.
Co-Authors Deki Satriawan Hery Kurniawan Zaenal Orias, Marco Yudhistira Prawira Utama