Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JTTM: Jurnal Terapan Teknik Mesin
Jajang Jaenudin
Caltex Riau Polytechnic, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Control & Systems Engineering Engineering Mechanical Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Painting robot with three axis motion Renggi Yunatatak; Jajang Jaenudin; Luqman Hakim; Mustaza Ma’a
JTTM : Jurnal Terapan Teknik Mesin Vol 5 No 1 (2024): JTTM: Jurnal Terapan Teknik Mesin
Publisher : Teknik Mesin - Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Muhammadiyah Cileungsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37373/jttm.v5i1.858

Abstract

Paint was applied directly to the painted surface while painting with a brush. There are occasionally unsatisfactory outcomes, such as paint stacking or streaks remaining. Spray guns yield better paint results, therefore a robot was developed that can regulate the spray gun's movement in order to apply paint. A painting robot that resembles an arm is one that has three axes of movement. The robot can move left-right on the x axis, up-down on the y axis, and back-front on the z axis. Its end effector is a spray cannon. An ultrasonic sensor is used to measure the distance between components and the spray gun; when the sensor measures near distances, such as between 4 and 8 cm, the test sensor distance measurements have a larger average error. When the test reading distance is increased from 10 cm to 14 cm, the average error reduces. Superior painting outcomes can be achieved with a paint distance of 10 cm, an air pressure of 80 psi, and a spray gun arm movement speed of 25 rpm. With average x-axis movement of 74.6 cm, y-axis movement of 14.8 cm, and z-axis movement of 88.2 cm, the largest volume that can be painted is 97,517.5 cm3. The rotation of the arm is used to determine the angular rotation needed to paint components. Painting the left side of the component at an angle of 10°, the back side at an angle of 100°, the right side at an angle of 190°, and only painting the front side of the component at the required angle of 90° require the rotational movement of the arm to the left.
Design player robot badminton-based microcontroller Rachmadiaz Miranto; Jajang Jaenudin; Mustaza Ma’a; Luqman Hakim
JTTM : Jurnal Terapan Teknik Mesin Vol 5 No 2 (2024): JTTM: Jurnal Terapan Teknik Mesin
Publisher : Teknik Mesin - Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Muhammadiyah Cileungsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37373/jttm.v5i2.990

Abstract

Robots are one of the technologies that is currently advancing quickly. Generally speaking, a robot's movement is similar to that of an automobile; it can only move forward, backward, left, and right. Because the movement is controlled by these movements, it is thought that the robot's movement is extremely restricted to the left and right directions. solely with the front wheels. As a result, a robot was developed in this study that can control sliding motions to the left and right utilizing omniwheels on its front and back wheels. Badminton is a sport involving rackets that is played by two people or two opposing pairs. Robotic badminton players are employed as a substitute for human trainers in the training process, particularly for service and drive motions. With the use of a wireless joystick, the robot's ATMega 8535 microprocessor controls both the robot's direction of motion and the movement of its racket. Using a double acting pneumatic cylinder that requires 7 bar of air pressure, the robot service arm uses the compressor's air pressure. The average time it takes for the racket to strike the ball at 7 bar of wind pressure is 00:5.2 seconds. The time it takes for the ball to fall onto the racket in the absence of wind pressure is 00:28 seconds on average. A difference value of 00:22.7 seconds is acquired, and this value will be utilized as the programming reference delay. The robot encounters a slope with an average angle change of 7º when moving forward, an average angle change of 10º when moving backward, an average angle change of 5.2º when moving right, and an average angle change of 3º when moving left. The uneven field surface causes the robot to move at a slope, which modifies the speed of the motor on the wheels
Co-Authors Luqman Hakim Mustaza Ma’a Rachmadiaz Miranto Renggi Yunatatak