Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights
Debora Tambunan
Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Enforcement of the Principle of Legality to Living Law as Legal Basis in the Positivism of Displacement Customary Law Juita Manalu; Martono Anggusti; Debora Tambunan
Golden Ratio of Data in Summary Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): May - October
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grdis.v4i2.716

Abstract

Living law is an inseparable part of the Indonesian criminal law system. However, in perspective of legality principle, living law causing pros and cons. The idea of regulating the living law in Indonesian, as the basis for criminal prosecution, for unregulated act is still debated. The issue that will be analysed in this article is how to apply living law/adat law as a basis for prosecuting criminals related to the existence of legality principle and, how to measure the enforcement of living law in criminal process. Based on the analysis using the principle of legality, it can be concluded that living law, as basis for prosecution, is contrary to principle of legality and protection of human rights. The enactment of living law can potentially create legal uncertainty and abuse of power by the government. Law enforcement against living law is also difficult to implement, because it is tied to the four indicators. Therefore, the living law provision better not be placed as part of general principles in the Indonesian Penal Code Bill. Keywords: Code Bill: Legality principle; Living law.
Tahapan Penyelesaian Perkara di Permata Law Office Advokat-Konsultan Hukum-Pengacara Pajak-Negosiator (Jl. Cemara Asri Boulevard Raya No.147, Medan Estate) Yoga Saputra Siagian; Debora Tambunan
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol 1, No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5444

Abstract

Penyelesaaian perkara dapat dilakukan melalui 2 jalur yaitu litigasi dan nonlitigasi. Jalur litigasi merupakan jalur yang di tempuh melalui pengadilan sedangkan jalur nonlitigasi merupakan jalur yang dilakukan diluar dari pengadilan. Dalam menyelesaikan perkara melalui jalur litigasi maupun jalur nonlitigasi maka seorang advokat harus mengetahui tahapan-tahapan yang perlu dilakukan melalui kedua jalur tersebut. Perbedaan tahapan penyelesaiaan perkara melalui jalur litigasi maupun jalur nonlitigasi perlu dipahami dengan benar. Adapun tahapan dari litigasi dalam PERMATA LAW OFFICE antara lain : Pertemuan dengan klien, pemberkasan perkara, pendaftaran gugatan, persidangan, putusan. Sedangkan tahapan melalui jalur nonlitigasi antara lain : pembukaan negosiasi, penjelasan aturan dan prosedur, penyampaian posisi awal dari masing-masing pihak, perundingan dan tawar-menawar, implementasi kesepakatan.
Co-Authors Juita Manalu Martono Anggusti Yoga Saputra Siagian