Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)
Ruth Megawati
Universitas Jember
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Education Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Project-Based Learning Model to Improve Students' Creativity in Biology Learning Media Courses Biology Education Study Program, Cenderawasih University Ruth Megawati; Wachju Subchan; Supeno; I Ketut Mahardika
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 10 No 10 (2024): October
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i10.9128

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve students' learning creativity through the application of the Project Based Learning (PjBL) learning model. This type of research is Classroom Action Research with four stages, namely planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The research instrument uses observation sheets and learning outcome tests. Observations are carried out during learning, and learning outcome tests are given at the end of each cycle. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained in cycle 1 that the creativity indicator for fluent thinking was 37% in the less category; cycle II 60% in the good category, and cycle III 73% in the good category; then the flexible thinking indicator in cycle I was 36% in the less category, cycle II 65% in the good category, and cycle III 78% in the good category; original thinking indicator cycle I is 20% in the less category, cycle II 61% is in the good category and cycle III 75% in the good category; elaboration thinking indicator cycle I is 15% in the very less category, cycle II 57% in the sufficient category and cycle III 67% in the good category. Learning outcome data in cycle I is only 37% of students who completed, cycle II 60% of students who completed, and cycle III 78% of students who completed.
Co-Authors I Ketut Mahardika Supeno Wachju Subchan