Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal TRANSPUBLIKA INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH IN EXACT SCIENCES (TIRES) International Journal of Social Science and Community Service
Sajiyo Sajiyo
Master of Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Environmental Science Mathematics Physics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Road Damage Analysis Using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Method as the Basis for Road Handling Programs on Provincial Roads in Pacitan Regency Fuad Jauhar Zuhri; Andi Patriadi; Sajiyo Sajiyo
TRANSPUBLIKA INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH IN EXACT SCIENCES Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): JANUARY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/tires.v4i1.1579

Abstract

Land transportation infrastructure, such as roads and bridges, plays a crucial role as a link between regions that supports the economic, social, and cultural growth of a region. With limited budget in road management in Pacitan Regency, priority determination is needed to ensure that road management is carried out more efficiently and on target. This study aims to calculate the weight of the criteria using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on expert opinions and to determine the priority order of road management in Pacitan Regency by utilizing the Provincial/Regency Road Management System (PKRMS) application, the AHP method, and a combination of the two methods. The method used in this study involves AHP with six criteria, namely road conditions, traffic volume, road connectivity, regional development, connecting economic and agricultural areas, and connecting public service facilities. This study focuses on five road sections in Pacitan Regency. The results of the study show that based on the AHP method, the road connectivity criterion gets the highest weight of (35%), followed by connecting public service facilities (22%), road conditions (14%), connecting economic and agricultural areas (13%), regional development (12%), and traffic volume (4%).
Sensitivity Analysis of Revenue Potential in The Evaluation of East Surabaya Hospital Investment Arianti Widi Astasari; Wateno Oetomo; Sajiyo Sajiyo
International Journal of Social Science and Community Service Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): OCTOBER
Publisher : CV. Proaksara Global Transeduka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70865/ijsscs.v2i4.32

Abstract

As one of the largest cities in Indonesia, the City of Surabaya has an obligation to provide excellent health services for its residents. It goes without saying that Surabaya City Government is required to provide a General Hospital that can receive referrals from the government-owned Community Health Centers. For this reason, the Surabaya City Government built the East Surabaya Hospital which is located in Rungkut Sub-District. East Surabaya Hospital is a strategic project that requires investment feasibility analysis. The East Surabaya Hospital investment feasibility analysis was done by applying the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Payback Period (PP) and Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) parameters. After the feasibility analysis results were obtained, a sensitivity analysis was done on changes in management costs and the amount of health service levy rates for each Fees alternative. Based on the results of the investment feasibility analysis of 4 (four) Fees alternatives, there are 2 alternatives that can be concluded as worthy investments, which are alternative 1 and alternative 3. Meanwhile, alternative 2 and alternative 4 are not feasible since the NPV parameter shows negative values and the IRR value is lower than the MARR value. However, based on sensitivity analysis, alternatives 2 and 4 can be feasible if alternative 2’s service rate is increased by 13.2%, and alternative 4’s service rate is increased by 2.3%. The opposite applies in alternative 1 where the investment might become unfeasible if the service rate is reduced by more than 5.4% and alternative 3 might become unfeasible if the service rate is reduced by more than 2.5%.
Co-Authors Andi Patriadi Arianti Widi Astasari Fuad Jauhar Zuhri Wateno Oetomo