Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Strategi Meningkatkan Pendapatan Masyarakat Desa Saitt Buttu Saribu Kecamatan Pamatang Sidamanik Melalui Desa Wisata Elfina Okto Posmaida Damanik; Muldri PJ Pasaribu; Rahmainim Saragih; Meylida Nurchmania; Ummu Harmain
JURNAL ADMINISTRASI & MANAJEMEN Vol 14, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen
Publisher : Universitas Respati Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52643/jam.v14i3.4284

Abstract

Desa Sait Buttu Saribu merupakan salah satu nagori yang ada di kecamatan Pematang Sidamanik, kabupaten Simalungun, provinsi Sumatera Utara,Indonesia. Nagori Sait Buttu Saribu merupakan salah satu dari 9 Nagori dan 1 kelurahan di Kecamatan Pamatang Sidamanik. Dengan luas wilayah +1347 Ha atau 30 dari luas Kecamatan Pamatang Sidamanik sebesar 13.654Ha. Nagori Sait Buttu Saribu terletak pada ketinggian rata – rata 800m di atas permukaan laut. jumlah dari Penduduk Nagori Sait Buttu Saribu berjumlah 4972 jiwa Sebagian besar masyarakatnya bermatapencaharian dari bertani, berdagang, dan beternak. Tahun 2021 desa Saitt Buttu Saribu ini ditetapkan sebagai salah satu desa wisata menawarkan wisata Agroekoedukasi dan Orientasi Budaya yang dikembangkan oleh masyarakat setempat. Sampai saat ini Desa Wisata Saitt Buttu mengalami kendala dalam menjalankan desa wisata, dimana jumlah wisatawan yang berkunjung tidak signifikan naik, sehingga pendapatan masyarakat sebagian besar dari hasil pertanian. Sehingga untuk dapat meningkatkan pendapatan masayarakat dari desa wisata ini diperlukan suatu strategi pengembangan yang diterapkan Desa Wisata Saitt buttu agar mendapatkan strategi yang cocok dengan menggunakan Analisis SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat). Hasil analisis faktor-faktor internal dan faktor-faktor eksternal tersebut diolah dengan menggunakan Matriks SWOT. Hasil dari pengolahan tersebut menghasilkan beberapa strategi yang dapat diterapkan oleh Desa Wisata Saitt Buttu. Hasil penentuan strategi dalam pengembangan Desa Wisata Saitt Buttu adalah membuat paket wisata baru dengan mempertahankan yang sudah ada dan memanfaatkan potensi yang masih belum dimaksimalkan; menjaga, melestarikan, dan menambah fasilitas dan potensi yang sudah ada; kegiatan wisata Direct Interaction lebih diperkuat pada segi lingkungan; memperbaiki jalan, menambah petunjuk arah dan tiket masuk atau karcis masuk; menerapkan perkembangan dan penggunaan teknologi dan melakukan kerjasama atau bermitra dengan biro perjalanan wisata untuk promosi; meningkatkan atau menambah pelayanan, kualitas, dan fasilitas yang sudah ada; dan melakukan kerjasama atau bermitra dengan tempat wisata lain Kata kunci: Pendapatan, Desa wisata saitt buttu, SWOT
Development of an Integrity Zone to Create a Corruption-Free Area at the Simalungun District Court Soraya Rizna Afrijal; Rony Andre C. Naldo; Muldri PJ Pasaribu
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.2057

Abstract

The government, through Regulation of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform (PermenPANRB) Number 5 of 2024, encourages bureaucratic reform and the development of Integrity Zones (ZI) to realize an accountable, effective, and integrity-based government towards the Corruption-Free Zone (WBK) predicate. The Simalungun District Court has implemented ZI development, but has not yet succeeded in obtaining the WBK predicate. This study aims to analyze the implementation of ZI development, obstacles to achieving WBK, and strategies to improve its success at the Simalungun District Court. The study uses an empirical juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and field interview data from 2026. The analysis was conducted qualitatively using the Theory of Law and Development, the Theory of Legal Effectiveness, and the Theory of Legal Certainty. The results of the study indicate that ZI development has been implemented, but has not been fully effective due to ongoing internal and external obstacles. The most crucial factor causing the failure to achieve the WBK predicate is the existence of disciplinary violations by officials during the assessment period, which directly impacts aspects of integrity and organizational governance. Therefore, improvement strategies need to prioritize strengthening integrity, preventing disciplinary violations, internal supervision, and strengthening governance of sustainable ZI development.
The Use of Electronic Evidence in Divorce Cases Due to Allegations of Domestic Violence at the Pematangsiantar Religious Court Al Zimy Siregar; Rony Andre C. Naldo; Muldri PJ Pasaribu
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.2058

Abstract

The development of information technology influences the evidentiary process in divorce cases, including those involving allegations of domestic violence. Digital communications, photos, videos, voice recordings, and electronic documents can record relevant facts, but their use still faces issues of authenticity, integrity, and evidentiary strength. This study analyzes the normative provisions, evidentiary strength, obstacles, and solutions for the use of electronic evidence in divorce cases at the Pematangsiantar Religious Court. This research is a holistic normative study with a prescriptive-analytical nature using the Theory of Evidence, the Theory of Legal Certainty, and the Theory of Legal Protection. Data analysis was conducted deductively-qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that electronic evidence has a valid legal basis, but its evidentiary strength depends on its authenticity, integrity, relevance, and connection with other evidence. Decision Number 129/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Pst demonstrates a formalist approach by rejecting the strength of electronic evidence that is not supported by expert examination, while Decision Number 63/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Pst demonstrates a contextual-integrative approach by positioning electronic evidence as preliminary evidence that can be corroborated by other evidence. This difference demonstrates the need for clearer assessment parameters and proportional expert examination.