Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Protection of Eigentumsverponding Deeds in the Context of Inheritance Rights Titin Hartati; Boy Nurdin
Journal of Social Research Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v3i12.2349

Abstract

The strength of the eigendom verponding deed in the context of inheritance rights, as well as the legal protection provided to the rights holders. The eigendom verponding deed serves as valid proof of land ownership and has significant legal implications, especially in the inheritance process. This research explores the legal protection available for holders of eigendom verponding deeds and the legal consequences arising from such deeds in the context of inheritance rights. It has been found that this deed can function as strong evidence in the inheritance process; however, it is also vulnerable to disputes if not supported by adequate documentation. This study also discusses efforts that eigendom verponding rights holders can undertake to safeguard and protect their inheritance rights. These efforts include land rights registration, conversion of rights into ownership rights, and compliance with applicable legal provisions to ensure that inheritance rights are recognized and not lost. This research emphasizes the importance of a deep understanding of the rights and obligations of eigendom verponding deed holders, as well as the need for consultation with legal advisors to minimize the risk of losing rights.
Legal Interoperability Issues Between the Online Single Submission System and the National Land Database Infrastructure Titin Hartati; Zudan Arief Fakrulloh
Journal Customary Law Vol. 3 No. 3.1 (2026): ICLSSEE Special Collection
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/jcl.v3i3.1.5863

Abstract

The digital transformation of the business licensing system through the Online Single Submission (OSS) has brought significant changes to government administration, including integration with the national land database. This integration is expected to accelerate public services and increase investment efficiency, but in practice, it presents various legal problems related to data validity, regulatory disharmony, and ambiguity in administrative responsibilities between institutions. The differences in character between the self-declaration mechanism in the OSS and the formal verification system in land administration give rise to potential legal data conflicts that can impact the certainty of land rights. This study seeks to analyze the configuration of the OSS system interoperability with land data, identify emerging normative conflicts, and formulate an ideal legal interoperability design to support legal certainty and protect community rights. The research method employed is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and systems approach, through qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The results show regulatory fragmentation between the investment acceleration regime and the precautionary principle in agrarian law, as well as the absence of clear legal standards regarding the hierarchy of data validity between government digital systems. This situation has the potential to trigger administrative errors, overlapping permits, and conflicts over digital data-based space. The ideal legal interoperability model is focused on establishing a legal validation layer, standardizing data validation authorities, harmonizing cross-sectoral regulations, and strengthening risk management-based governance within the SPBE ecosystem. This approach is expected to create system integration that is not only technically efficient but also aligns with the principles of legal certainty and the protection of land rights.
Strengthening Notary Reporting Obligations to Prevent Money Laundering in Property Transactions Titin Hartati; KMS Herman
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.452

Abstract

Money laundering through property transactions poses a significant threat to Indonesia’s legal system and economic integrity due to the high value and complex nature of real estate dealings. Notaries, as public officials authorized to draft authentic deeds and verify legal transactions, occupy a strategic position in detecting and preventing money laundering activities. This study aims to analyze the role of notaries in preventing money laundering in property transactions through the reformulation of reporting obligations. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches by examining Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering, Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Position of Notaries, and PPATK Regulation Number 3 of 2021 concerning reporting procedures for certain professions. The findings reveal that although the legal framework clearly establishes notaries as reporting parties, implementation remains ineffective due to internal obstacles such as limited technical understanding and conflicts with professional secrecy, as well as external obstacles including weak coordination with PPATK and insufficient legal protection for reporting notaries. This study concludes that reformulating reporting obligations is necessary through clearer normative positioning of notaries, simplified and digitized reporting mechanisms, strengthened legal protection, and continuous professional training. Optimizing these aspects will enhance the preventive function of notaries and significantly contribute to national efforts to combat money laundering in the property sector.