Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Uncertainty in the Regulation of Advocates' Immunity Rights in Law Enforcement Processes in Indonesia Runik Erwanto; Suparno Suparno
Syntax Idea 6730-6743
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i11.11177

Abstract

This research aims to explore the legal uncertainty surrounding the regulation of advocates' immunity rights in the practice of law enforcement in Indonesia. Although Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates provides a legal basis for advocates' immunity, its implementation is often inconsistent and vulnerable to intervention. This potentially hampers advocates in performing their functions as independent legal enforcers free from pressure. This research also discusses efforts that can be made to create legal certainty regarding advocates' immunity rights, including the formulation of clear regulations, education for stakeholders, and strengthening the role of advocates’ associations. By increasing understanding and respect for advocates' immunity rights, it is hoped that a safer and fairer environment for advocates to carry out their profession will be created, thus supporting the rule of law in Indonesia
Artificial Intelligence and Legal Transformation: Towards an Adaptive Justice System Runik Erwanto; Richard Richard
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2025): INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Publisher : Pusat Publikasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58631/injurity.v4i6.1452

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has had a major impact on various sectors, including the legal and judicial systems, which demand a transformation towards digitalization and efficiency. This research aims to analyze the contribution of AI in transforming conventional legal practices towards a more adaptive justice system, as well as examine the ethical, regulatory, and technological challenges that arise. This research uses a qualitative approach with literature studies as the main technique, reviewing literature, legal documents, and case studies of the application of AI in the judicial system in various countries. The findings show that AI is able to improve the efficiency and accuracy of legal processes, but its implementation still faces obstacles in terms of regulation, algorithm transparency, and institutional readiness. The transformation of the legal system through AI is inevitable, but it needs to be accompanied by regulatory reform, increased legal digital literacy, and the principle of prudence in its application in order to uphold substantive justice.