Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Iustitia: Journal of Legal Theory, Politics, and International Relations Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Corpus: International Journal of Law and Political Authorit
Teddy Delano
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS KELEMAHAN HAK CIPTA SEBAGAI OBYEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA Pandu Dwi Widayat; Teddy Delano
Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 16 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta menyebutkan bahwa “Hak Cipta dapat dijadikan sebagai objek jaminan fidusia”. Hingga saat ini, banyak lembaga keuangan yang masih enggan menerima Hak Cipta sebagai jaminan fidusia. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini adalah mengkaji kelemahan Hak Cipta sebagai obyek jaminan dalam Fidusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kelemahan Hak Cipta sebagai objek jaminan fidusia adalah nilai ekonomisnya yang sulit diprediksi. Hak Cipta tidak seperti benda berwujud (asset) lainya yang cenderung lebih stabil dan mudah dalam melakukan penilaian asset. Hak Cipta tidak mempunyai kepastian dalam hal assessment dan nilainya, sehingga membuat para kreditor enggan untuk menerimanya sebagai objek jaminan fidusia, karena ketakutan akan mengalami kerugian.
Legal Harmonization of Electronic Evidence within Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Imroatun Solekah; Teddy Delano
Iustitia: Journal of Legal Theory, Politics, and International Relations Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): May: Iustitia: Journal of Legal Theory, Politics, and International Relations
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the harmonization of electronic evidence regulation within Indonesia’s criminal justice system by analyzing normative inconsistencies between the Criminal Procedure Code, the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, and sectoral electronic system regulations. The research employs a normative doctrinal and comparative legal approach using statutory interpretation, conceptual analysis, and comparative legal reasoning to evaluate admissibility standards, authentication procedures, evidentiary value, and procedural safeguards governing electronic evidence. The findings demonstrate that fragmented evidentiary regulation has generated judicial inconsistency concerning digital authentication, forensic verification, chain of custody, and procedural legality in criminal proceedings. Indonesian courts continue to apply divergent interpretations regarding the relationship between electronic evidence and the principle of negative statutory proof, particularly in relation to evidentiary reliability and constitutional due process. The study proposes a harmonized evidentiary governance model integrating procedural codification, forensic standardization, institutional synchronization, and unified judicial interpretation in order to strengthen legal certainty, procedural fairness, and technological accountability within Indonesia’s digital criminal justice administration. The proposed framework reinforces institutional coherence across investigation, prosecution, and adjudication processes.
The Right to Explanation in Artificial Intelligence–Based Decision-Making: A Normative Perspective on Due Process and Legal Accountability Imroatun Solekah; Sahal Hanafi; Wildan Baehaqi; Teddy Delano
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in legally significant decision-making has generated fundamental challenges concerning procedural fairness, transparency, and legal accountability. This article examines the juridical status of the right to explanation in AI-based decision-making through a normative and doctrinal legal research approach supported by comparative analysis of contemporary regulatory frameworks and legal theories. The study analyzes international legal instruments, administrative law principles, data protection regulations, accountability doctrines, and scholarly debates addressing explainability, due process, and algorithmic governance. The findings demonstrate that explanation performs a constitutive legal function within procedural justice by enabling meaningful participation, contestation, review, and accountability. Existing legal frameworks increasingly recognize the necessity of explainability, although regulatory approaches remain fragmented regarding its normative scope and enforceability. The analysis further reveals that accountability for AI-generated decisions must remain attached to identifiable human and institutional actors, regardless of technological complexity. Recognition of the right to explanation as an enforceable procedural guarantee strengthens legality, safeguards individual rights, and preserves rule-of-law values within automated governance systems. The study contributes a coherent normative framework connecting explainability, due process, and legal accountability in contemporary AI regulation.
Decentralization and Public Accountability: Evaluating Legal Frameworks of Local Governance Performance in Southeast Asia Aswanto Aswanto; Teddy Delano; Azka Syifaul Maula
International Journal of Law and Political Authority Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : April: Corpus: International Journal of Law and Political Authority
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between decentralization and public accountability through an empirical normative legal analysis of local governance frameworks in Southeast Asia. The research integrates doctrinal legal interpretation with comparative governance evaluation in order to assess the effectiveness of constitutional regulation fiscal decentralization and digital governance within decentralized administrative systems. Primary legal materials consist of constitutional provisions regional governance statutes judicial decisions and ASEAN institutional instruments while empirical evidence is derived from Worldwide Governance Indicators transparency reports and official governmental publications concerning local governance performance. The findings demonstrate that decentralization strengthens democratic participation and regional administrative flexibility although fragmented regulatory structures uneven institutional capacity and inconsistent fiscal supervision continue to weaken accountability performance across local governments. Fiscal decentralization contributes to regional economic development and governmental responsiveness yet simultaneously increases corruption risks budgetary opacity and supervisory complexity within multilevel governance systems. The study further identifies that digital governance transformation and hybrid administrative coordination require adaptive legal frameworks capable of integrating transparency institutional supervision and technological accountability in order to preserve democratic legitimacy and effective public administration within Southeast Asian decentralized governance systems.
Co-Authors Aswanto Aswanto Azka Syifaul Maula Imroatun Solekah Pandu Dwi Widayat Sahal Hanafi Wildan Baehaqi