Azka Syifaul Maula
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reconceptualizing Legal Protection Against Deepfake Technology: A Normative Analysis of Privacy, Personality Rights, and Digital Evidence Azka Syifaul Maula; Ali Hardana
Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : June: Lex Recta: Journal of Law and Normative Justice
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid development of deepfake technology has generated significant challenges for contemporary legal systems by destabilizing traditional conceptions of privacy, personal identity, and evidentiary authenticity. This study aims to reconceptualize legal protection against deepfake technology through a normative and doctrinal analysis of privacy rights, personality rights, and digital evidence. Employing a non-empirical legal research methodology, the study examines international human rights instruments, statutory regulations, judicial developments, legal doctrines, and comparative regulatory approaches concerning artificial intelligence and synthetic media governance. The analysis demonstrates that existing legal frameworks remain fragmented because privacy regulations primarily focus on informational control, personality-rights doctrines have not fully adapted to synthetic identity replication, and evidentiary regimes continue to rely upon assumptions of authenticity that are increasingly vulnerable to algorithmic manipulation. Deepfake technology creates a multidimensional legal injury that simultaneously affects identity integrity, individual autonomy, dignity, and procedural justice. The study argues that effective legal protection requires an integrated normative framework that recognizes synthetic identity harms as violations of interconnected legal interests. Such a framework strengthens legal certainty, enhances rights protection, and supports the development of more reliable evidentiary standards in digitally mediated societies.
Decentralization and Public Accountability: Evaluating Legal Frameworks of Local Governance Performance in Southeast Asia Aswanto Aswanto; Teddy Delano; Azka Syifaul Maula
International Journal of Law and Political Authority Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : April: Corpus: International Journal of Law and Political Authority
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between decentralization and public accountability through an empirical normative legal analysis of local governance frameworks in Southeast Asia. The research integrates doctrinal legal interpretation with comparative governance evaluation in order to assess the effectiveness of constitutional regulation fiscal decentralization and digital governance within decentralized administrative systems. Primary legal materials consist of constitutional provisions regional governance statutes judicial decisions and ASEAN institutional instruments while empirical evidence is derived from Worldwide Governance Indicators transparency reports and official governmental publications concerning local governance performance. The findings demonstrate that decentralization strengthens democratic participation and regional administrative flexibility although fragmented regulatory structures uneven institutional capacity and inconsistent fiscal supervision continue to weaken accountability performance across local governments. Fiscal decentralization contributes to regional economic development and governmental responsiveness yet simultaneously increases corruption risks budgetary opacity and supervisory complexity within multilevel governance systems. The study further identifies that digital governance transformation and hybrid administrative coordination require adaptive legal frameworks capable of integrating transparency institutional supervision and technological accountability in order to preserve democratic legitimacy and effective public administration within Southeast Asian decentralized governance systems.