Efrila Efrila
Program Pascasarjana Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Protection Of Victims Of Mental Retardation Rape As A State Of Helplessness Citra Arga Fajar Diva; Efrila Efrila; Ahmad Jaeni
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6972

Abstract

Rape is a form of sexual violence that not only violates human rights, but also causes deep physical and psychological trauma to the victim. In this context, victims with mental retardation are in a very vulnerable position and are often unable to defend themselves or give legitimate consent. This condition makes them a group that needs special protection under the law. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of rape victims who experience mental retardation as a state of helplessness based on the applicable laws in Indonesia. Rape is a form of sexual violence that violates human rights and results in deep physical and psychological trauma for the victim. Victims with mental retardation have a higher vulnerability and require special protection. The approach used in this study is normative juridical, by analyzing related laws and regulations, including the Criminal Code (KUHP), Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, and Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities. The results of the study show that although there are regulations that provide legal protection for rape victims, the implementation and enforcement of the law still face various obstacles. Factors such as social stigma, a lack of understanding of mental retardation, and limited resources in the justice system often hinder effective protection for victims. This study recommends increased socialization and training for law enforcement officials, as well as the provision of better support services for victims with mental retardation.
Juridical Analysis Of The Delegation Of Authority Of Doctors To Nurses In Health Services At Health Centers Maya Santika; Rokhmat Rokhmat; Efrila Efrila; Sutrisno Sutrisno
JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Dehasen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jhs.v10i2.6973

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juridical aspect of the delegation of authority from doctors to nurses in health services in health centers. Delegation of authority is an important process in the implementation of health services, especially in health centers, which often face limited human resources. This study uses a normative approach by analyzing applicable laws and regulations, including the Medical Practice Law, the Nursing Law, and other related regulations. The results of the study show that the delegation of authority from doctors to nurses must be based on clear and specific legal provisions to ensure the legality and safety of patients. Complete and accurate documentation of the patient's medical record is essential to maintain transparency and accountability in the delegation of authority process. In addition, the delegation of authority must be carried out by considering the competence and qualifications of nurses, and accompanied by adequate supervision from the doctor who provides the authority. This study concludes that although delegation of authority is a common and necessary practice in health services in Puskesmas, its implementation must be strictly regulated and supervised to ensure that the health services provided remain in accordance with professional standards and applicable laws.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Dokter Menjalani Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana Mempekerjakan Dokter yang Tidak Memiliki Izin Praktik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dibidang Pelayanan Kesehatan Taufik Hidayat Nasution; Efrila Efrila
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6546

Abstract

Dalam praktiknya, dokter kerap menghadapi dilema dalam menjalankan peran dan tugasnya, baik sebagai Dokter Penanggung Jawab Pelayanan (DPJP) maupun sebagai peserta program pendidikan dokter spesialis (PPDS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana penerapan hukum terhadap dokter yang mempekerjakan dokter lain tanpa memiliki izin praktik, serta merumuskan konsep penyelesaian hukum yang ideal bagi dokter yang sedang menjalani pemeriksaan perkara pidana dalam sistem peradilan pidana pada bidang pelayanan kesehatan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan kepustakaan, serta analisis kualitatif untuk memperoleh pemahaman yang komprehensif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan hukum terhadap dokter dalam mempekerjakan dokter yang tidak memiliki izin praktik belum memberikan perlindungan hukum sebagaimana mestinya. Selain itu, mekanisme penyelesaian hukum perkara pidana di luar pengadilan melalui mediasi juga belum sepenuhnya diakomodasi. Konsep penyelesaian hukum yang ideal bagi dokter yang menghadapi perkara pidana dalam sistem peradilan pidana pun dinilai belum optimal dalam praktik. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan aturan yang lebih jelas mengenai penerapan mekanisme keadilan restoratif pada tindak pidana medik, yang diatur secara khusus dalam regulasi internal lembaga penyidik (Perkap), penuntut umum (Perja), maupun hakim (Perma).