Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal jurnal syntax admiration Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Putu Davis Justin Thenata
Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Kasus Pertanahan Studi Perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Prancis Putu Davis Justin Thenata; Ryan Jovan Susanto; Jeanette Olivia Kurniawati; Jessica Carol Lee
Jurnal Syntax Admiration Vol. 5 No. 12 (2024): Jurnal Syntax Admiration
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jsa.v5i12.1857

Abstract

Unlawful Actions (PMH) in land cases is an important issue in the legal system in various countries, including Indonesia and France. Although both countries have similar basic principles regarding PMH, there are fundamental differences in the way they are regulated and implemented, especially in the land context. This research aims to analyze the comparison between the PMH concept in Indonesia and France, with a focus on resolving land disputes. The method used is a comparative approach, comparing the legal provisions applicable in both countries, as well as the dispute resolution mechanisms applied in practice. The research results show that although there are similarities in the aim of protecting land rights and providing compensation to injured parties, each country has different legal characteristics in dealing with unlawful acts in the land context. In Indonesia, dispute resolution is more formal and bureaucratic, while in France it prioritizes mediation and a social approach. Apart from that, the difference in the application of subjective and objective responsibility is also an important differentiating factor in law enforcement related to PMH.  
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Kasus Pertanahan Studi Perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Prancis Putu Davis Justin Thenata; Ryan Jovan Susanto; Jeanette Olivia Kurniawati
Jurnal Syntax Admiration Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Syntax Admiration
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jsa.v6i1.2028

Abstract

Unlawful Actions (PMH) in land cases is an important issue in the legal system in various countries, including Indonesia and France. Although both countries have similar basic principles regarding PMH, there are fundamental differences in the way they are regulated and implemented, especially in the land context. This research aims to analyze the comparison between the PMH concept in Indonesia and France, with a focus on resolving land disputes. The method used is a comparative approach, comparing the legal provisions applicable in both countries, as well as the dispute resolution mechanisms applied in practice. The research results show that although there are similarities in the aim of protecting land rights and providing compensation to injured parties, each country has different legal characteristics in dealing with unlawful acts in the land context. In Indonesia, dispute resolution is more formal and bureaucratic, while in France it prioritizes mediation and a social approach. Apart from that, the difference in the application of subjective and objective responsibility is also an important differentiating factor in law enforcement related to PMH.
Analisis Tanggung Jawab Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Perbankan dan Nasabah Dalam Kasus Phishing Putu Davis Justin Thenata; Ryan Jovan Susanto; Jeanette Olivia Kurniawati; Jessica Carol Lee
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v5i4.2628

Abstract

Phishing merupakan bentuk kejahatan siber yang kian berkembang seiring dengan kemajuan teknologi, khususnya dalam sektor perbankan. Kejahatan ini dilakukan dengan cara menyamar sebagai entitas terpercaya, seperti pihak bank, guna menipu korban agar memberikan informasi pribadi yang bersifat rahasia, seperti nomor rekening, PIN, atau kata sandi. Serangan phishing sangat merugikan nasabah karena dapat menyebabkan kebocoran data dan kerugian finansial. Oleh karena itu, upaya pencegahan phishing harus melibatkan kebijakan perlindungan hukum yang tegas serta peningkatan literasi digital di kalangan nasabah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Sumber data diperoleh dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder seperti undang-undang, jurnal hukum, dan dokumen resmi terkait perlindungan konsumen dan keamanan siber. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah korban phishing belum optimal. Pengaturan yang lebih spesifik dan sanksi terhadap pelaku phishing perlu diperkuat, serta mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa bagi nasabah harus disosialisasikan secara lebih luas. Nasabah harus diberikan hak untuk menyelesaikan masalah melalui mekanisme penyelesaian langsung dengan bank, jalur hukum formal, maupun lembaga penyelesaian sengketa konsumen. Implikasi dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap phishing di sektor perbankan harus ditingkatkan melalui regulasi yang komprehensif dan pendidikan berkelanjutan kepada masyarakat untuk menciptakan sistem perbankan yang aman dan terpercaya.
Co-Authors Jeanette Olivia Kurniawati Jessica Carol Lee Ryan Jovan Susanto