Reza Octavia Kusumaningtyas
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of the Anti-Corruption Commission Supervisory Board in Institutionalizing Accountability Reza Octavia Kusumaningtyas; Ong Argo Victoria
Contrarius Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v1i1.83

Abstract

The Supervisory Board of Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) holds significant potential to strengthen ethical standards and prevent the abuse of power. However, its effectiveness remains hindered by persistent issues, particularly concerning its independence, transparency, and vulnerability to political interference. This study aims to evaluate the role of the Supervisory Board in institutionalizing accountability and compares its framework with the supervisory model adopted by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), which is known for its inclusive and multi-layered oversight structure. Employing a normative legal research method, this study integrates a qualitative approach, comparative legal analysis, review of relevant literature, and a case study of the MACC’s supervisory system. The findings reveal that Malaysia’s model, which incorporates multiple independent oversight bodies and encourages public participation, promotes stronger accountability and transparency. In contrast, the centralized nature of the KPK Supervisory Board, which places significant control within the executive branch, raises concerns over potential political intervention and conflicts of interest. The study concludes that to function effectively as a credible accountability mechanism, the KPK Supervisory Board requires institutional reform. Enhancing its structural independence and transparency is essential to ensuring its role in the sustainable fight against corruption in Indonesia.
The Implication of Halal Tourism Regulations to Encourage Community Well-Being: Lesson From Malaysia Reza Octavia Kusumaningtyas; Rodiyah Rodiyah; Duhita Driyah Suprapti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5280

Abstract

It is crucial to ascertain whether halal tourism regulation can stimulate economic growth and promote sustainable national development to achieve community well-being. This research aims to advance halal tourism regulation to encourage the community's well-being. This research employs a qualitative methodology to conduct sociological and legal research. The research’s findings show that the decentralization of halal tourism regulation is intended to enhance the community's well-being. Nevertheless, the central level has not engaged in any discussions regarding the legal framework governing halal tourism implementation. The number of tourist visits, destinations, and hotels can be increased by the implications of halal tourism regulation in the form of Regional Regulations, particularly in West Nusa Tenggara. However, this has not resulted in community well-being. In contrast, Malaysia maintains robust institutions and regulations. The regulation of halal tourism in Malaysia is crucial for enhancing community well-being, as it promotes economic growth, employment opportunities, and adherence to Islamic principles. Consequently, it is crucial to enhance the institutional framework in Indonesia to supervise the implementation of halal tourism, foster collaboration among stakeholders, and strengthen regulations surrounding halal tourism to encourage community well-being.