Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Doris Rahmat
Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Authority of The Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission Post Amendment to Law No. 19 of 2019: Regresive or Progressive in Law Enforcement? Fransiscus Xaverius Hastowo Broto Laksito; Rian Saputra; Doris Rahmat; Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Aji Bawono; Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.5334

Abstract

The aim of this research is to look at the transformation of the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution after the revision of the new Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law in supporting corruption prevention policies in Indonesia. This research was conducted using doctrinal legal research methods or normative legal research. In this research, the approaches used include: Statute Approach. Conceptual Approach, Historical Approach, Case Approach. The research results show that: 1) The authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the promulgation of Law no. 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, with the addition of the Supervisory Board within the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)  Institution which has quite large authority, namely not only supervision but also the implementation of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee, namely that it must first obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before carrying out wiretapping, searches and/ or the confiscation is carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission, this can hinder law enforcement in eradicating criminal acts of corruption and can also affect the independence of the Eradication of Corruption Crimes within the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution.
Position of Customary Courts in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution Doris Rahmat; Rian Saputra
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5517

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the role of customary justice in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The normative legal technique was employed in the research, which included numerous primary and secondary data sources such as the 1945 Constitution, regulations, legislation, court decisions, legal theories, and even scholarly opinions. The study's findings imply that Pancasila is necessary or coercive in nature. This means that anyone who is within the scope of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia must respect Pancasila as a national outlook, including the State and the law itself. This means that the points of "Just and Civilized Humanity" and "social justice for all Indonesian people" which adhere to the principle of equal rights and justice must always be obeyed by all elements in the Republic of Indonesia. Pancasila is also a juridical-sociological basis, or in other words, it is the basis of norms and laws that live in society, and thus Pancasila has fulfilled the principles and basic values ​​according to the development and needs of society and the State.
Co-Authors Aji Bawono Fransiscus Xaverius Hastowo Broto Laksito Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto Rian Saputra Waluyo Slamet Pradoto