Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Santoso Budi Nursal Umar
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Consequences of Cancellation of the Land Sale and Purchase Agreement by the Seller Consequences of Buyer Defaulting Santoso Budi Nursal Umar; Doris Rahmat
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v2i2.3438

Abstract

This research aims to determine the process of canceling a land sale and purchase by the seller because the buyer defaulted, the legal consequences of canceling the land sale and purchase agreement by the seller because the buyer defaulted. The research method used in this research is descriptive analytical. The research results of the sale and purchase agreement process are valid and have binding force since an agreement is reached between the seller and the buyer. The sale and purchase agreement is based on the validity of the contract and other agreement principles. An agreement can be null and void (van rechtswege neiting) or can be canceled (vernietigbaar), if an agreement does not meet the requirements specified in accordance with Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely if it does not fulfill subjective requirements (they agree to bind themselves, are competent to make an agreement) and objective conditions (a certain thing, a lawful cause). The legal consequences that arise for the buyer if they default, the buyer is required to pay compensation for losses suffered by the seller, pay court costs if sued in court, and fulfill the agreement if it continues
Legal Consequences of Cancellation of the Land Sale and Purchase Agreement by the Seller Consequences of Buyer Defaulting Santoso Budi Nursal Umar; Doris Rahmat
Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Januari : Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/mahkamah.v2i1.365

Abstract

This research aims to determine the process of canceling a land sale and purchase by the seller because the buyer defaulted, the legal consequences of canceling the land sale and purchase agreement by the seller because the buyer defaulted. The research method used in this research is descriptive analytical. The research results of the sale and purchase agreement process are valid and have binding force since an agreement is reached between the seller and the buyer. The sale and purchase agreement is based on the validity of the contract and other agreement principles. An agreement can be null and void (van rechtswege neiting) or can be canceled (vernietigbaar), if an agreement does not meet the requirements specified in accordance with Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely if it does not fulfill subjective requirements (they agree to bind themselves, are competent to make an agreement) and objective conditions (a certain thing, a lawful cause). The legal consequences that arise for the buyer if they default, the buyer is required to pay compensation for losses suffered by the seller, pay court costs if sued in court, and fulfill the agreement if it continues.
Legal Review and Democratic Challenges of Community Organizations in Indonesia Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Santoso Budi Nursal Umar
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v3i1.4774

Abstract

This research discusses the phenomenon of social organizations (ormas) in Indonesia from a legal perspective and the challenges of democracy. The freedom of association guarantyd by Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution serves as the legal basis for the existence of social organizations, which are further regulated by Law Number 17 of 2013 and Law Number 16 of 2017. Regulatory changes, particularly the government's authority to dissolve mass organizations without judicial process, have sparked a debate between the need to maintain public order and the guaranty of the principle of due process of law. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach, supported by a literature study from primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that although mass organizations have great potential in strengthening democracy, challenges such as identity politics, radicalism, lack of funding transparency, and state power abuse against mass organizations still pose major obstacles. Therefore, balanced legal regulations, transparent oversight, and enhanced democratic literacy are needed to ensure that the role of social organizations remains in line with the principles of the rule of law and Pancasila democracy
Legal Review and Democratic Challenges of Community Organizations in Indonesia Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Santoso Budi Nursal Umar
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2411

Abstract

This research discusses the phenomenon of social organizations (ormas) in Indonesia from a legal perspective and the challenges of democracy. The freedom of association guarantyd by Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution serves as the legal basis for the existence of social organizations, which are further regulated by Law Number 17 of 2013 and Law Number 16 of 2017. Regulatory changes, particularly the government's authority to dissolve mass organizations without judicial process, have sparked a debate between the need to maintain public order and the guaranty of the principle of due process of law. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach, supported by a literature study from primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that although mass organizations have great potential in strengthening democracy, challenges such as identity politics, radicalism, lack of funding transparency, and state power abuse against mass organizations still pose major obstacles. Therefore, balanced legal regulations, transparent oversight, and enhanced democratic literacy are needed to ensure that the role of social organizations remains in line with the principles of the rule of law and Pancasila democracy.  
Analysis and Legal Implications of the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Determination of the Age Limit for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates Santoso Budi Nursal Umar; Waluyo Slamet Pradoto
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2444

Abstract

This research discusses the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 regarding the minimum age requirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidates as stipulated in Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. In that decision, the Constitutional Court ruled that the age limit of 40 years remains in effect, but with an exception for candidates who are not yet 40 years old but have previously or are currently serving as regional heads. This research employs a normative juridical method with legislative and conceptual approaches, analyzing primary legal materials such as the 1945 Constitution, Election Law, and Constitutional Court decisions, supported by secondary legal materials from academic literature and journals. The research findings indicate that the Constitutional Court's considerations are based on the principles of citizens' constitutional rights, open legal policy, and the idea of leadership experience as an alternative age requirement. This decision has positive implications, including opportunities for leadership regeneration and increased political participation by young people, but it also draws criticism for its potential to discriminate against non-regional leaders and create political suspicion. Therefore, a revision of the Election Law is needed to clarify the legal norms resulting from the Constitutional Court's decision so that it does not lead to multiple interpretations and maintains the principle of equality. This research concludes that the Constitutional Court's decision is an opportunity to strengthen democracy, but also a challenge in ensuring constitutional justice in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Rahmat, Doris Waluyo Slamet Pradoto