Tanega, Joseph
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Review of the Indonesian Regulatory Policy on MSMEs and Cooperatives for Boosting Economic Potential towards the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Koesrianti, Koesrianti; Tanega, Joseph
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 11, No 3 (2024): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Indonesian government emphasizes the economic potentials of Indonesian micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) and cooperatives in the Industrial Revolution 0.4 by adopting regulations, policies, and programs that are MSME friendly. This study aims to review the optimization of MSMEs’ digital capability by examining the regulations, the policies, and the programs. It examines the regulatory framework that facilitates the digital MSMEs ecosystem work. Employing a cross-disciplinary approach within law and economics, this legal study adopts a descriptive design, using data from primary and secondary sources on the digitalization of MSMEs in Indonesia. The digital economy necessitates specific managing the adoption of Information Communication and Technology (ICT) across all businesses in Indonesia, including large enterprises, small enterprises, and micro businesses. This study argues that these government measures had a low impact on Indonesian MSMEs. This study concludes that sustainability government support in creating an inclusive digital economy of MSMEs is indispensable. The spirit of gotong royong, Indonesia's culture of community cooperation, should be leveraged to empower MSMEs. The absence of a centralized institution to coordinate policies and programs on the digitalization of MSMEs undermines the effectiveness of the national digital strategies for MSMEs. Indonesia’s plan to become the tenth-largest economy in the world by 2030 may remain unattainable without addressing the gap.
Legal Analysis of Transparency on the Implementation of The ASEAN Trade in Services Agreement (ATISA) Koesrianti, Koesrianti; Tanega, Joseph
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Legal Transformation and Policy Challenges in Indonesia: Navigating Technology
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v10i1.13530

Abstract

In international trading system, trade in services covers a wide range of intangible and heterogeneous products and activities which making it complex in the implementation phase. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) had established a progressive agreement on trade in services, the ASEAN Trade in Services Agreement (ATISA) that brings trade liberalization on services by recognizing progressive negative list approach. Nevertheless, there is no clear framework on how this agreement will be applied as ASEAN Member States (AMS) have difference economic policies considered the complexities of services sector. This paper aims to explore the regulation on trade in services, in particular the legal analysis of transparency of the implementation of the negative list approach brought by ATISA. This new agreement has a built-in agenda for AMS to convert their previous commitments of positive approach under ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services (AFAS). This paper is a doctrinal research based on secondary data by analysing the existing international legal instruments on trade, ASEAN agreements and policies on the liberalization of trade in services in the context of the ASEAN single market and production base as well as epicentre of growth. Despite its’ potential benefits of ATISA, this article identifies substantial challenges in implementing newly trade in services agreement in ASEAN. This article argues that ASEAN still needs improving the regulatory standards for the service sector and reducing the unnecessary barriers to service trade within ASEAN, as well as increasing the respective regulatory transparency in each AMS.