Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGARUH ASAS IN DUBIO PRO REO TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PIDANA Rahmadani, Dea Nanda
Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 10 (2024): Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora
Publisher : Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.572349/kultura.v2i10.3881

Abstract

Penelitian ini berjudul "Pengaruh Asas In Dubio Pro Reo Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Pidana". Asas In Dubio Pro Reo merupakan prinsip hukum yang menyatakan bahwa jika terdapat keraguan dalam pembuktian suatu perkara, maka keraguan tersebut harus ditafsirkan untuk keuntungan terdakwa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan asas tersebut dalam putusan hakim di Indonesia, serta dampaknya terhadap keadilan dalam perkara pidana. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis Pasal 183 KUHAP yang mengatur asas tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun asas In Dubio Pro Reo memiliki landasan hukum yang kuat, penerapannya sering kali tidak konsisten, yang dapat mengakibatkan ketidakadilan bagi terdakwa. Salah satu contoh nyata adalah kasus Sengkon dan Karta yang dihukum meskipun bukti yang diajukan tidak cukup kuat. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa penerapan asas In Dubio Pro Reo harus diperkuat untuk melindungi hak-hak terdakwa dan memastikan keadilan dalam sistem peradilan pidana.
From Privacy to Exploitation: A Victimological Analysis of Cases Involving the Non-Consensual Distribution of Intimate Content Putri, Yuliani Finaly; Rahmadani, Dea Nanda; Suardi, M Dede Al Farabi; Salwarani, Denies; Utami, Ria Anggraeni
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19537062

Abstract

The development of digital technology has made communication easier, but it has also opened up opportunities for new forms of crime, one of which is the non-consensual distribution of intimate content (non-consensual intimate images). This phenomenon is becoming increasingly common and has serious impacts on victims, whether psychologically, socially, or legally. Unfortunately, victims are often blamed, as they are perceived to have contributed to the occurrence of the incident. This study aims to analyze the position of victims in cases of non-consensual dissemination of intimate content using a victimological perspective, particularly through victim typology and modern victimology approaches. The method used is normative juridical, with a conceptual approach and case studies drawn from relevant news reports. The results of the analysis show that the use of classical victimological typologies often has the potential to create bias and reinforce victim blaming, especially in the context of digital crimes. Therefore, a modern victimology approach is considered more relevant, as it places victims as parties who must be protected rather than blamed. In addition, regulations such as the Law on Sexual Violence Crimes have provided a foundation for legal protection, although in practice they still face various challenges