Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Salih Mauludin, Teza
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penyimpangan terhadap Pasal 5 Ayat (1) Huruf b dan c Peraturan Kejaksaaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif terhadap Perkara yang Memiliki Kriteria/Keadaan yang Bersifat Kasuistik Salih Mauludin, Teza; Sulistiani, Lies; Ramdan, Ajie
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Article 5 Paragraph (1) of Perja 15/2020 is a cumulative principle requirement. However, in certain criminal acts the three principle conditions can be distorted as in Article 5 Paragraph (2), Paragraph (3), and Paragraph (4). This study examines the current regulation of the implementation of deviations from Article 5 Paragraph (1) letter b and c of Perja 15/2020 and the enforcement of law deviations from Article 5 Paragraph (1) Letter b and c of Perja 15/2020 by the public prosecutor. The research method used is juridical normative in the form of an assessment of literature materials or secondary data. The statute approach and the case approach are the two approaches used in this study. To obtain information that supports this study, data collection techniques in the form of interviews were also used. The results showed that currently the implementation of the termination of prosecution deviates from Article 5 Paragraph (1) Letters b and c referring to Perja 15/2020.
PELAKSANAAN ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ODR) SETELAH BERLAKUNYA 2021 ARBITRATION RULES DAN DAMPAKNYA BAGI PARA PIHAK Salih Mauludin, Teza; Adwinata, Tito; Dwiputra, Arvin Galuh
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Tema Hukum Internasional dan Perbandingan Hukum
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rise of information technology has significantly impacted the way business disputes are resolved. With a high volume of online trade, disputes can arise as frequently as they do in traditional business dealings. The increase in trading activities naturally leads to an increase in disputes that need resolution. One approach to resolving these disputes efficiently and fairly for both parties is through arbitration and alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Over time, this has evolved into Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). At a regulatory level, the implementation of ODR is guided by rules issued by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), which is recognized as a global authority. The issuance of the 2021 Arbitration Rules brings significant changes to the implementation of ODR. Previously, ODR required the consent of the parties, but now it is possible to carry out ODR regardless of the objections of the parties.
Co-Authors Adwinata, Tito Ajie Ramdan Dwiputra, Arvin Galuh Lies Sulistiani