Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education)
Maureen, Jessica Febrianti
Unknown Affiliation
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EVALUATING UPTAKE TOWARDS WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TO IMPROVE WRITING SKILLS Maureen, Jessica Febrianti; Syamsi, Vera
IJEE (INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH EDUCATION) IJEE (INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH EDUCATION)| VOL. 11 | NO. 2 | 2024
Publisher : Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v11i2.40309

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in higher education, specifically within a Composition II course. It aims to identify the most commonly used types of WCF, their acceptance by students, and their impact on writing improvement. Using content analysis, 88 instances of WCF from the first and second essay drafts of 18 students were categorized into four types according to Hattie and Timperley framework: feeding up at the task level, feeding back at the task level, feeding back at the process level, and feeding forward at the process level. Feeding forward at the process level was most prevalent (51%), followed by feeding up and feeding back at the process level (20.5% each), and feeding back at the task level (8%). Feeding up at the task level had the highest acceptance rate (89%). Conversely, feeding back at the task level and feeding back at the process level had moderate reception (57% and 56%), while feeding forward at the process level had a substantial acceptance rate (67%). The findings emphasize that clear, varied, and goal-oriented feedback enhances students’ engagement, self-regulation, and writing proficiency by addressing specific areas for improvement and guiding future development, ultimately fostering sustained academic growth.
EVALUATING UPTAKE TOWARDS WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK TO IMPROVE WRITING SKILLS Maureen, Jessica Febrianti; Syamsi, Vera
IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) IJEE (INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH EDUCATION)| VOL. 11 | NO. 2 | 2024
Publisher : Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v11i2.40309

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in higher education, specifically within a Composition II course. It aims to identify the most commonly used types of WCF, their acceptance by students, and their impact on writing improvement. Using content analysis, 88 instances of WCF from the first and second essay drafts of 18 students were categorized into four types according to Hattie and Timperley framework: feeding up at the task level, feeding back at the task level, feeding back at the process level, and feeding forward at the process level. Feeding forward at the process level was most prevalent (51%), followed by feeding up and feeding back at the process level (20.5% each), and feeding back at the task level (8%). Feeding up at the task level had the highest acceptance rate (89%). Conversely, feeding back at the task level and feeding back at the process level had moderate reception (57% and 56%), while feeding forward at the process level had a substantial acceptance rate (67%). The findings emphasize that clear, varied, and goal-oriented feedback enhances students’ engagement, self-regulation, and writing proficiency by addressing specific areas for improvement and guiding future development, ultimately fostering sustained academic growth.
Co-Authors Syamsi, Vera