Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Salim, Patrick Winson
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pemenuhan Asas Keadilan Dalam Penerapan Parliamentary Threshold Pada Pemilihan Umum Legislatif di Indonesia Salim, Patrick Winson; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10907

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and find out the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7 of 2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 and evaluate whether its application meets the principles of justice. This is motivated by the application of the parliamentary threshold regulated in Law No. 7 of 2027 on General Elections and reaffirmed through Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 which is considered not fulfilling the principle of justice and violating the 1945 Constitution. The urgency of this research is to provide legal clarity regarding the parliamentary threshold, which is intended to maintain the quality of representation in parliament, but in practice creates problems of injustice for parties that are unable to meet the threshold. The novelty in this author's research is to show that the application of the parliamentary threshold can reduce the diversity of political choices and affect the fairness of representation. The research method used in this study is the normative method. The results show that the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7/2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 reflects the Court's efforts to consider the principle of justice. Stating that the threshold is still needed, but it must be reviewed to ensure more proportional and democratic representation. This is in line with the concept of justice according to philosophers who view that the review of the threshold also aims to provide opportunities for underrepresented parties, support the principle of justice as fairness, and achieve justice that allows future parliamentary thresholds to be determined based on popular sovereignty. Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 serta mengevaluasi apakah penerapannya memenuhi asas keadilan. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penerapan ambang batas parlemen yang diatur dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2027 tentang Pemilihan Umum dan ditegaskan kembali melalui Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 yang dianggap tidak memenuhi asas keadilan dan melanggar Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945. Urgensi penelitian ini ialah memberikan kejelasan secara hukum mengenai parliamentary threshold yang dimaksudkan untuk menjaga kualitas representasi di parlemen dalam praktiknya justru menciptakan permasalahan ketidakadilan bagi partai-partai yang tidak mampu memenuhi ambang batas tersebut. Kebaruan dalam penelitian penulis ini adalah menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dapat mereduksi keberagaman pilihan politik dan memengaruhi keadilan representasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 mencerminkan upaya MK mempertimbangkan asas keadilan. Menyatakan ambang batas tetap diperlukan, tetapi harus ditinjau untuk memastikan representasi yang lebih proporsional dan demokratis. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan konsep keadilan menurut filsuf-filsuf yang memandang peninjauan ambang batas juga bertujuan memberi kesempatan bagi pihak yang kurang terwakili, mendukung prinsip justice as fairness serta mencapai keadilan yang memungkinkan parliamentary threshold masa depan ditetapkan berdasarkan kedaulatan rakyat.
Interpretation Of Legal Philosophy Of Contemporary Law Salim, Patrick Winson; Candra, Dimas; Rasji, Rasji
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 4 No. 12 (2023): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v4i12.834

Abstract

Law is an inseparable element of human life. Over time, the law undergoes significant changes to adapt to changes in society and social progress. This transformation has created various contemporary legal issues that require deep philosophical understanding. The interpretation of legal philosophy plays a central role in addressing the challenges of contemporary law. This approach not only provides profound insights into the philosophical dimensions of the law but also helps to understand how contemporary law changes and adapts to the dynamics of society and the development of social progress. Legal philosophy is a discipline that seeks to find truth or a deeper understanding of the law. In this context, legal philosophy is not only concerned with technical aspects or concrete legal regulations but also seeks a broader understanding of the values, ethics, morality, justice, and underlying purposes of the law. This research aims to explain "How can the application of the interpretation of legal philosophy address contemporary legal challenges?" This analysis takes a literature study approach as the basis for the paper's preparation. The findings of the exploration indicate that the interpretation of legal philosophy allows for deep critical thinking about contemporary legal issues, helps identify underlying values, and formulates better and fairer solutions to these problems
Co-Authors Candra, Dimas Rasji, Rasji Tundjung Herning Sitabuana