Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia: Implementasi Denda Keterlanjuran Tata Kelola Sawit Berdasarkan Tindak Pidana Kehutanan Siagian, Royan; Hoesein, Zainal Arifin
RIO LAW JURNAL Vol 6, No 1 (2025): Rio Law Jurnal
Publisher : Universitas Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36355/rlj.v6i1.1593

Abstract

Pada dasarnya, tata kelola sawit diizinkan oleh negara melalui regulasi yang ada dan merupakan bagian dari upaya negara untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan rakyat. Salah satu masalah utama yang sering muncul dalam tata kelola industri sawit adalah praktek ilegal, seperti konversi hutan secara tidak sah, deforestasi ilegal, dan perusakan ekosistem yang berdampak pada kerusakan lingkungan jangka panjang. Dalam rangka mengatasi permasalahan ini, denda keterlanjuran tata kelola sawit menjadi salah satu instrumen yang penting, baik di Indonesia maupun Malaysia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan hukum. Implementasi tata kelola industri sawit berkelanjutan melalui RSPO, ISPO, dan MSPO di Indonesia dan Malaysia menghadapi tantangan dalam efektivitas dan pengawasan. Implementasi denda keterlanjuran dalam tata kelola sawit di Indonesia dan Malaysia bertujuan menegakkan aturan penggunaan hutan yang sah untuk mencegah kerusakan lingkungan. Di Indonesia, sanksi pidana diterapkan untuk mencegah konversi hutan ilegal, sedangkan di Malaysia, peraturan ketat dan sertifikasi RSPO/MSPO memastikan keberlanjutan industri sawit.
Reformulation of Palm Oil Governance Regulations in Forest Areas Towards Legal and Ecological Justice in Indonesia Siagian, Royan; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Mei - Juli 2025)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v3i2.387

Abstract

Ilegal oil palm plantations in forest areas are a serious challenge that threatens legal justice, environmental sustainability, and the well-being of local communities in Indonesia. This research is motivated by the rampant practice of transferring forest functions into oil palm land which often does not have a legal basis, especially in the Central Kalimantan region. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of law enforcement against illegal palm oil business actors, assess legal certainty based on the principle of justice, and formulate a more equitable legal reform model. The method used is empirical juridical research with legal, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of the study show that the implementation of Articles 110A and 110B of Law Number 6 of 2023 still faces various obstacles, such as overlapping authority, weak law enforcement capacity, and the influence of political and economic interests. Although normatively it has provided a basis for action, the regulation has not been able to realize substantive justice for the community and the environment. Theoretical analysis using the framework of Lawrence M. Friedman, John Rawls, and Jan Michiel Otto reveals the need for legal reform that is adaptive, participatory, and recognizes legal pluralism, including the recognition of customary law. In conclusion, the success of the reformulation of palm oil regulations is not enough with the tightening of administrative sanctions, but must be accompanied by institutional structuring, the use of monitoring technology, and the active involvement of local communities in the legal process. Policy recommendations are directed at the creation of socially and ecologically equitable palm oil governance through a collaborative approach between the state, communities, and business actors.