Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.513
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Social Service and Research Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian
Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
The Integration of Restorative Justice Principles in the Handling of Narcotics Crimes Based on the Principles of Justice and Legal Reform Sudiyanto, Sudiyanto; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v5i6.1250

Abstract

The rehabilitation of individuals struggling with addiction to narcotics, as outlined in Law No. 35/2009, underscores a two-pronged strategy that prioritises the recovery of health and social reintegration. This approach eschews criminal retribution in favour of more holistic methods of addressing the issue. The concept of restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach to narcotics crime resolution, emphasising the recovery of offenders, victims and communities through dialogue and deliberation, rather than punishment. However, this approach is not without its challenges, and as such, the establishment of a robust legal framework is paramount. This research aims to integrate the concept and principles of restorative justice in the handling of narcotics abuse cases in Law No. 35/2009 based on the principle of justice and examine the legal reform of the application of restorative justice in the settlement of narcotics offences. The research method employed is a normative research method through a legislative approach and analytical approach. The results obtained demonstrated that the concepts and principles of restorative justice can be integrated in handling narcotics abuse cases based on Law No. 35/2009 to realise the principle of justice. The fundamental tenet of restorative justice emphasises the rehabilitation of individuals who use narcotics as a means of recovery, superseding the mere imposition of punishment. It is therefore imperative that a comprehensive revision of Law No. 35/2009 is made in order to incorporate the restorative justice approach on a more extensive scale.
Reconstruction of Bankruptcy Law for State-Owned Enterprises and Private Enterprises in the Perspective of Economic Justice Siringoringo, Naek Mampetua; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Mei - Juli 2025)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v3i2.364

Abstract

The current bankruptcy legal system in Indonesia shows inequality in treatment between State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and private companies, especially in terms of filing bankruptcy applications. In practice, SOEs often receive stronger legal protection than private companies, both because of their status as managers of public interest and government policy interventions, which give rise to economic injustice and inequality. The purpose of this study is to critically examine the differences in regulation, implementation, and propose legal reforms that ensure fairness in bankruptcy filings for SOEs and private companies. This research uses a juridical-empirical approach with reference to the theory of legal minds, legislation theory, and development law reform theory. The results of the study show that the bankruptcy arrangement for SOEs and the private sector does not reflect the principles of justice and equality before the law, because there are significant differences in treatment in submission procedures and requirements, as well as the intervention of state actors against SOEs. Legal reconstruction is needed so that bankruptcy regulations are fairer and more accommodating to dynamic economic needs, while maintaining national stability and legal certainty. The conclusion of this study is that Indonesia's bankruptcy system requires comprehensive reform based on substantive justice values, so that law is not only a technical instrument, but also a social engineering tool towards national economic balance.
Legal Reformulation of Political Rights of Members of the Indonesian National Army to Ensure Democratic Justice and Enforcement of Human Rights Ferdinal, Ocktave; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Mei - Juli 2025)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v3i2.365

Abstract

Political rights, including the right to vote, are fundamental components of human rights as enshrined in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia—specifically Article 27(1), Article 28D(1), and Article 28E(3)—and further reinforced by Article 43 of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. These constitutional provisions are consistent with Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which affirms that “Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.” In practice, however, statutory provisions such as Article 39 of Law No. 34 of 2004 on the Indonesian National Army and Article 200 of Law No. 7 of 2017 on Elections explicitly prohibit members of the Indonesian National Army from exercising their right to vote. This raises concerns regarding legal coherence and potential breaches of the principle of non-discrimination. This research examines the legal-political framework regulating the political rights of military personnel and proposes a legal reformulation grounded in the principles of human rights and equitable democratic participation. Employing a normative legal methodology, the study adopts statutory and conceptual approaches informed by the notion of non-discriminatory justice. The findings highlight inconsistencies between current legal norms and constitutional values, advocating for a phased legal reform which distinguishes between active and passive suffrage, supported by independent oversight to uphold military neutrality without infringing upon the constitutional rights of citizens.
Reformulation of Palm Oil Governance Regulations in Forest Areas Towards Legal and Ecological Justice in Indonesia Siagian, Royan; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Mei - Juli 2025)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v3i2.387

Abstract

Ilegal oil palm plantations in forest areas are a serious challenge that threatens legal justice, environmental sustainability, and the well-being of local communities in Indonesia. This research is motivated by the rampant practice of transferring forest functions into oil palm land which often does not have a legal basis, especially in the Central Kalimantan region. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of law enforcement against illegal palm oil business actors, assess legal certainty based on the principle of justice, and formulate a more equitable legal reform model. The method used is empirical juridical research with legal, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of the study show that the implementation of Articles 110A and 110B of Law Number 6 of 2023 still faces various obstacles, such as overlapping authority, weak law enforcement capacity, and the influence of political and economic interests. Although normatively it has provided a basis for action, the regulation has not been able to realize substantive justice for the community and the environment. Theoretical analysis using the framework of Lawrence M. Friedman, John Rawls, and Jan Michiel Otto reveals the need for legal reform that is adaptive, participatory, and recognizes legal pluralism, including the recognition of customary law. In conclusion, the success of the reformulation of palm oil regulations is not enough with the tightening of administrative sanctions, but must be accompanied by institutional structuring, the use of monitoring technology, and the active involvement of local communities in the legal process. Policy recommendations are directed at the creation of socially and ecologically equitable palm oil governance through a collaborative approach between the state, communities, and business actors.
Konstruksi Pengetahuan Dalam Filsafat Ilmu Dan Penerapannya Dalam Pembentukan Kriteria Keadilan Dalam Filsafat Hukum Rochmadi, Rochmadi; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i2.9909

Abstract

Makalah ini membahas konstruksi pengetahuan dalam filsafat ilmu dan penerapannya dalam pembentukan kriteria keadilan dalam filsafat hukum, dengan fokus pada studi kasus kasus Brown v. Board of Education di Amerika Serikat. Filsafat ilmu mengajukan pertanyaan fundamental tentang hakikat pengetahuan, metode perolehannya, dan validitasnya. Filsafat hukum, di sisi lain, menyoroti konsep keadilan dan cara mewujudkannya dalam sistem hukum. Melalui metode deskriptif kualitatif, makalah ini menggabungkan analisis teks filosofis dan studi literatur untuk memahami konstruksi pengetahuan dalam filsafat ilmu dan penerapannya dalam pembentukan kriteria keadilan dalam filsafat hukum. Studi kasus Brown v. Board of Education menunjukkan bagaimana pertimbangan ilmiah dan moral memengaruhi pengambilan keputusan hukum, menegaskan bahwa keadilan dalam hukum tidak dapat terlepas dari pemahaman yang mendalam tentang realitas sosial dan konteksnya. Hasil pembahasan menyoroti pentingnya pengetahuan dalam memahami dan mengatasi ketidakadilan sosial, serta mengembangkan kerangka kerja untuk menerapkan pengetahuan dalam filsafat ilmu dalam pembentukan kriteria keadilan dalam filsafat hukum. Karya-karya filosof ilmu seperti Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, dan Paul Feyerabend, serta teori-teori keadilan dari John Rawls, H.L.A. Hart, dan Ronald Dworkin, menjadi landasan utama untuk analisis ini.
Penafsiran Filsafat Ilmu Dan Filsafat Hukum Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Ketatanegaraan Kontemporer Widianto, Donny; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i2.9916

Abstract

Penafsiran filsafat ilmu dan filsafat hukum memiliki peran penting dalam menghadapi tantangan ketatanegaraan kontemporer yang kompleks dan multidimensional. Globalisasi, disrupsi teknologi, dan polarisasi politik telah menciptakan lanskap yang rumit bagi pemerintahan dan lembaga hukum di berbagai negara. Dalam konteks ini, filsafat ilmu memberikan wawasan tentang bagaimana mengelola tantangan globalisasi dengan penggunaan bukti empiris dan pengetahuan ilmiah, sedangkan filsafat hukum membantu dalam memahami dasar-dasar moral dan politik dari sistem hukum serta merumuskan prinsip-prinsip yang mengatur interaksi antara negara-negara dalam sistem internasional. Integrasi antara keduanya memungkinkan pengembangan solusi-solusi yang komprehensif untuk membangun masa depan yang lebih stabil, adil, dan berkelanjutan. Dengan melibatkan pendekatan analitis dari filsafat ilmu dan refleksi kritis dari filsafat hukum, kebijakan-kebijakan publik yang responsif dan inklusif dapat dirumuskan. Studi kasus tentang sengketa Laut China Selatan dan legalisasi ganja mengilustrasikan bagaimana integrasi antara kedua bidang pengetahuan ini dapat menghasilkan solusi yang holistik. Langkah-langkah seperti meningkatkan kerjasama lintas-disiplin, memperkuat pendidikan dan pelatihan, serta mendorong penelitian interdisipliner diperlukan untuk memperkuat peran filsafat ilmu dan filsafat hukum dalam menghadapi tantangan-tantangan ketatanegaraan kontemporer
Metafisika Hukum Pemilu: Refleksi Filosofis Terhadap Konsep Pelanggaran Dalam Konteks Pemilihan Umum Meidiawaty, Fusia; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10442

Abstract

Sistem demokrasi didasarkan pada pemilihan umum. Namun, proses ini sering kali rentan terhadap pelanggaran yang membahayakan integritas dan legitimasi demokrasi. Penelitian ini mengkaji pelanggaran metafisika UU Pemilu dan kualitas demokrasi. Pelanggaran dan dampaknya terhadap demokrasi diformulasikan dalam metafisika UU Pemilu. Penelitian ini mengkaji literatur UU Pemilu, filsafat hukum, dan teori demokrasi dengan menggunakan metodologi kualitatif-filosofis. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif-analitik untuk menyelidiki makna, pelaksanaan, dan konsekuensi filosofis dari pelanggaran pemilu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelanggaran merupakan penyimpangan ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis yang rumit dari norma-norma hukum. Topik ini juga mencakup klasifikasi pelanggaran pemilu, interpretasi dan pembuktian hukum, serta peran dan kewajiban penyelenggara, peserta, dan pengawas pemilu. Pelanggaran pemilu merusak legitimasi pemilu dan kepercayaan terhadap demokrasi. Oleh karena itu, tindakan yang terkoordinasi dan terfokus sangat penting untuk mengurangi pelanggaran dan memajukan demokrasi. Kesimpulan ini menekankan perlunya memperkuat pengawasan dan penegakan hukum, kesadaran masyarakat, partisipasi masyarakat sipil dan media independen, serta mekanisme pengawasan internal untuk meningkatkan integritas dan legitimasi pemilu dan membangun kepercayaan publik terhadap demokrasi.
Rekonstruksi Batas Diskresi Fiskal Pemerintah dalam Keadaan Darurat Berdasarkan Prinsip Proposionalitas Konstitusional Israhadi, Evita Isretno; Wibi Wibowo, Ariffianto; Yuliyanah, Henny; Muhlis, Muhlis; Gabetua, Yelris
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/7rtzg956

Abstract

Government fiscal discretion during emergencies is essential for ensuring effective governance in responding to economic crises, pandemics, and national disasters. However, the current legal framework emphasizes governmental authority rather than its limitations, creating legal uncertainty and failing to fully reflect the principle of constitutional proportionality. This study aims to examine why the existing limits on fiscal discretion do not embody constitutional proportionality and to propose a reconstruction based on this principle. Using a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials through qualitative legal interpretation and argumentation. The findings reveal ambiguous legal norms regarding the scope of fiscal authority, the absence of proportionality parameters as standards for exercising discretion, and weak constitutional oversight mechanisms. The proposed reconstruction establishes constitutional proportionality as the foundation for regulating fiscal discretion by defining clear limits on governmental authority, strengthening oversight, and restricting the scope and duration of emergency fiscal measures. This reconstruction is expected to improve legal certainty, accountability, and constitutional control over state financial management during emergency situations.
Co-Authors Donny Widianto Ferdinal, Ocktave Gabetua, Yelris Lingga Nugraha Meidiawaty, Fusia Muhlis Muhlis Rochmadi Rochmadi Siagian, Royan Siringoringo, Naek Mampetua Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Wibi Wibowo, Ariffianto Yuliyanah, Henny