Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Kristianto Ratu Marius Naben
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Plagiarisme dalam Dunia Pendidikan: Analisis Masalah Sosial dan Urgensi Pendidikan Karakter Kristianto Ratu Marius Naben; Heni Widyawati
SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): Desember 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/sosmaniora.v3i4.4664

Abstract

Plagiarism is taking someone else's work and using it in academic writing as if it were his/her own. Plagiarism is a form of moral offense and people who commit plagiarism will get criminal and civil punishment if proven to do so. Plagiarism can also be seen as a social problem in the world of education that needs to be taken seriously so that people no longer commit plagiarism. Therefore, this article aims to analyze plagiarism in education as a social problem to find the root of the problem and emphasize the importance of character building as an effort to overcome the practice of plagiarism. The research method used in this research is literature study. The author analyzed several literatures on plagiarism and character building. The important finding of this research is that plagiarism is rooted in the mentality of people who knowingly and willingly take other people's works for their own benefit even though they know that such actions are not allowed. In response to this, the author emphasizes the importance of character building as a means of forming a solid self so as not to be trapped in the practice of plagiarism. The author concludes that plagiarism is a practice that harms the dignity of education. Therefore, we must give an attention to implement character building as the basis of one's moral life to avoid plagiarism.
Paradoks Pekerja Rumah Tangga di Indonesia: Belum Tergolong Pekerja Yang Melakukan Pekerjaan Layak? Naben, Kristianto Ratu Marius
SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/sosmaniora.v2i4.2717

Abstract

This article is an analysis of the paradoxical situation experienced by domestic workers in Indonesia. On the one hand, they exist as workers, but on the other hand, their existence as workers has not been recognized and their rights as workers have not been fully fulfilled and they do not receive social protection guarantees from the government. This position makes them vulnerable to exploitation, violence and oppression. Therefore, by using qualitative research methods, especially literature studies based on literature and previous research results, the author shows the social exclusion of domestic workers in Indonesia. Based on the facts above, the author emphasizes the importance of applying the concept of decent work for domestic workers and promoting domestic work as a decent work for domestic workers. One conclusion that can be drawn from discussing this topic is that domestic workers also count as workers and that domestic work is also decent work that should be widely accepted. With this recognition, the existence of a legal umbrella and guaranteed social protection for domestic workers is a must. Thus, recognizing the existence of domestic workers and their work is an intention to build an inclusive social order, in which there is recognition and respect for a person's dignity.
Membandingkan Demokrasi dan Penganggaran Partisipatif ala Porto Alegre-Brasil dan Musrenbang Partisipatif ala Indonesia Kristianto Ratu Marius Naben
SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/sosmaniora.v2i4.2889

Abstract

This article is a literature study to make a comparison between the practice of participatory democracy and participatory budgeting from Porto Alegre and development planning deliberations practiced in Indonesia. The aim of this comparative study is to look further at community participation in planning, monitoring and evaluating public policy. Porto Alegre is one of the states in Brazil that has succeeded in developing participatory democracy to maximize public participation in state life. Participatory democracy is a form of collective decision-making process that combines elements of direct democracy from civil society and representatives or legislatures. The concrete manifestation of participatory democracy is participatory budgeting. In democracy and participatory budgeting, there is an open space for civil society to participate, dialogue and collaborate with the government, legislative members and other parties to design, implement and evaluate public policy. Community participation in planning programs and public policies is also practiced in Indonesia through development planning meetings. This deliberation is carried out from the village/sub-district level to the national level. However, the reality shows that the level of community participation in development planning meetings is still low for various reasons. This study concludes that the democratic and participatory budgeting model is more successful in mobilizing community participation than the development planning meetings.
Co-Authors Heni Widyawati