Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Sosiologi, Antropologi, dan Budaya Nusantara
Kristianto Ratu Marius Naben
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Plagiarisme dalam Dunia Pendidikan: Analisis Masalah Sosial dan Urgensi Pendidikan Karakter Kristianto Ratu Marius Naben; Heni Widyawati
SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): Desember 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/sosmaniora.v3i4.4664

Abstract

Plagiarism is taking someone else's work and using it in academic writing as if it were his/her own. Plagiarism is a form of moral offense and people who commit plagiarism will get criminal and civil punishment if proven to do so. Plagiarism can also be seen as a social problem in the world of education that needs to be taken seriously so that people no longer commit plagiarism. Therefore, this article aims to analyze plagiarism in education as a social problem to find the root of the problem and emphasize the importance of character building as an effort to overcome the practice of plagiarism. The research method used in this research is literature study. The author analyzed several literatures on plagiarism and character building. The important finding of this research is that plagiarism is rooted in the mentality of people who knowingly and willingly take other people's works for their own benefit even though they know that such actions are not allowed. In response to this, the author emphasizes the importance of character building as a means of forming a solid self so as not to be trapped in the practice of plagiarism. The author concludes that plagiarism is a practice that harms the dignity of education. Therefore, we must give an attention to implement character building as the basis of one's moral life to avoid plagiarism.
Membandingkan Demokrasi dan Penganggaran Partisipatif ala Porto Alegre-Brasil dan Musrenbang Partisipatif ala Indonesia Kristianto Ratu Marius Naben
SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/sosmaniora.v2i4.2889

Abstract

This article is a literature study to make a comparison between the practice of participatory democracy and participatory budgeting from Porto Alegre and development planning deliberations practiced in Indonesia. The aim of this comparative study is to look further at community participation in planning, monitoring and evaluating public policy. Porto Alegre is one of the states in Brazil that has succeeded in developing participatory democracy to maximize public participation in state life. Participatory democracy is a form of collective decision-making process that combines elements of direct democracy from civil society and representatives or legislatures. The concrete manifestation of participatory democracy is participatory budgeting. In democracy and participatory budgeting, there is an open space for civil society to participate, dialogue and collaborate with the government, legislative members and other parties to design, implement and evaluate public policy. Community participation in planning programs and public policies is also practiced in Indonesia through development planning meetings. This deliberation is carried out from the village/sub-district level to the national level. However, the reality shows that the level of community participation in development planning meetings is still low for various reasons. This study concludes that the democratic and participatory budgeting model is more successful in mobilizing community participation than the development planning meetings.
KRITIK TERHADAP UPAYA JOKOWI MENGHAPUS OPOSISI DARI PERSPEKTIF DEMOKRASI MENURUT PANDANGAN CAK NUR Kristianto Ratu Marius Naben; Alfian Tanggang
SABANA: Jurnal Sosiologi, Antropologi, dan Budaya Nusantara Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/sabana.v4i3.5629

Abstract

This article aims to criticize Joko Widodo's efforts, when he was still President of the Republic of Indonesia, to eliminate the opposition from Indonesia from the perspective of democracy according to Cak Nur's view. This study uses a literature study, namely by collecting data from various journals, books, including several news items related to the theme of the article. The results of this study indicate that Jokowi's decision to fatten his coalition is an attempt to eliminate the opposition in Indonesia. This policy has a negative impact on the sustainability of democracy in Indonesia. This is reinforced by Cak Nur's view of the importance of the opposition for a democratic country like Indonesia. Cak Nur believes that the opposition plays a role in maintaining the stability of a nation. Therefore, the opposition cannot be eliminated with any argument. During his administration, Jokowi tried to eliminate the opposition in Indonesia because he actually did not understand the basic principles of democracy and tended to want to strengthen his dominance in the seat of power. Jokowi's fat coalition is a decision that endangers the sustainability of democracy in this country, because the vital functions of the opposition cannot be carried out.
Co-Authors Alfian Tanggang Heni Widyawati