Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Intepretasi Tindak Tutur Penggunaan Ragam Bahasa Model Martin Joos pada Berita Online Nuryansyah Adijaya; M. Yanuardi Zain; Febriyantina Istiara
Ksatra: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Ksatra
Publisher : LPPM STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52217/ksatra.v6i2.1571

Abstract

Interpretation in communication plays an important role in understanding the message conveyed in every utterance. However, disagreements sometimes arise because the receiver of the message interprets the utterance differently. This study aims to delve deeper into the interpretation of speech acts in the use of language varieties, particularly the use of frozen language variety in online media reporting. A qualitative descriptive method is used in this research to discuss the interpretation of the use of frozen language variety. The results of this study indicate that the use of frozen language varieties such as the words "sultan," "baginda," and "paduka" can be interpreted not only to indicate a degree of honor but also as satire to mock someone. One piece of evidence is when a governor was addressed as "baginda," and he responded to the greeting with displeasure. Another example is when a ministry was dubbed the "sultan ministry," which indicates a satire or criticism of the institution. This shows that language varieties, especially frozen language, can have different interpretations depending on the social, cultural, and value context in society.
Intepretasi Tindak Tutur Penggunaan Ragam Bahasa Model Martin Joos pada Berita Online Nuryansyah Adijaya; M. Yanuardi Zain; Febriyantina Istiara; Dayana, Yuliana Fatima
Ksatra: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Ksatra
Publisher : LPPM STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52217/ksatra.v6i2.1571

Abstract

Interpretation in communication plays an important role in understanding the message conveyed in every utterance. However, disagreements sometimes arise because the receiver of the message interprets the utterance differently. This study aims to delve deeper into the interpretation of speech acts in the use of language varieties, particularly the use of frozen language variety in online media reporting. A qualitative descriptive method is used in this research to discuss the interpretation of the use of frozen language variety. The results of this study indicate that the use of frozen language varieties such as the words "sultan," "baginda," and "paduka" can be interpreted not only to indicate a degree of honor but also as satire to mock someone. One piece of evidence is when a governor was addressed as "baginda," and he responded to the greeting with displeasure. Another example is when a ministry was dubbed the "sultan ministry," which indicates a satire or criticism of the institution. This shows that language varieties, especially frozen language, can have different interpretations depending on the social, cultural, and value context in society.
Interpretasi Tindak Tutur melalui Metakognisi pada Pidato Presiden: Kajian Kritis terhadap Pidato Kepala Negara Nuryansyah Adijaya; M. Natsir Amir; M. Yanuardi Zain; Febriyantina Istiara
Ksatra: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Ksatra
Publisher : LPPM STKIP PGRI Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52217/ksatra.v7i1.1824

Abstract

This study aims to explore the influence of metacognition on the comprehension of speech acts within presidential speeches. Presidential speeches are a formal mode of communication that requires the audience to grasp both the explicit and implicit meanings of the messages conveyed. In this communication process, metacognition—which involves awareness, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive processes—plays a crucial role in helping the audience identify intentions, resolve ambiguities, and enhance comprehension effectiveness. This study employs qualitative content analysis to identify the metacognitive strategies applied by listeners and to assess their impact on interpreting speech acts in presidential speeches. The findings reveal that listeners with high metacognitive awareness are better equipped to accurately and reflectively understand messages, particularly when faced with indirect speech or implicit meanings. In addition to contributing theoretically by enriching the study of the relationship between metacognition and speech acts, this research also offers practical insights for public speakers to craft more effective, persuasive, and audience-responsive speeches. These findings are expected to enhance formal communication practices and foster stronger connections between leaders and society.