Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role Of Advocates In Realizing Justice In Indonesia Fauziah Lubis; Kurnia Fanny; Erwin, Erwin; Tasya Fadillah; Krisnadi Kusuma Suwandi; Franstogi Anugrahta Simbolon; Kamaluddin Simamora
Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 02 (2025): Fox justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Edition 2025
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of advocates in realizing distributive justice and commutative justice, especially in the context of defending client rights in the legal system. The problem of this research focus on how advocates play a role in both types of justice, both in the fair distribution of resources ( distributive justice ) and in ensuring a balance of rights and Obsessions in relationships between individuals ( commutative justice ). This research is motivated by the strategic role of advocates in the justice system that can support the achievement of justice through defending the rights of individual and groups. Distributive justice is related to the fair distribution of resources, while commutative justice emphasizes the fulfillment of equal obligations in legal relationships between parties. This study uses a normative research method, namely by analyzing legal norms that regulate the role of advocates in realizing both types of justice, as well as various relevant legal literature. The roles of advocates shows that advocates have an important role in supporting distributive justice by helping marginalized or disadvantaged clients get their rights, and play a role in creating commutative justice by ensuring the exchange of rights and obligations between parties involved in the dispute. This study provides insight into the importance of the role of advocates in realizing more equitable and balanced justice in society.
EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR IN WAGE DISPUTES FROM THE MAQASID SYARI'AH PERSPECTIVE Krisnadi Kusuma Suwandi; Zaid Alfauza Marpaung
Journal Analytica Islamica Vol 15, No 1 (2026): ANALYTICA ISLAMICA
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/jai.v15i1.28489

Abstract

Informal construction workers constitute one of the most vulnerable labor groups, particularly in matters related to wage rights. The absence of clear contracts, the dominant position of employers, and the limited availability of legal protection mechanisms place these workers in a weak bargaining position. This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection available to informal construction workers in wage disputes based on Indonesian positive law and to compare them with the perspective of Maqasid al-Shari’ah. This research employs an empirical legal method with a sociological approach. The findings reveal that although legal protection is normatively provided through labor regulations, its implementation remains ineffective due to weak supervision, the absence of written agreements, low legal literacy among workers, and highly hierarchical employment relations. From the perspective of Maqasid al-Shari’ah, practices such as unilateral wage deductions, delayed payments, and unclear employment agreements constitute violations of the principles of hifz al-māl (protection of wealth) and hifz al-nafs (protection of life), and contradict the value of justice (‘adl).