Hidayah, Alfa Handi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Studi Komparasi Hermeneutika Negosiasi Ibnu Rusyd dan Khaled untuk Mengatasi Ketimpangan Penafsiran Firdaus, Yusuf; Hidayah, Alfa Handi
Lathaif: Literasi Tafsir, Hadis dan Filologi Vol 3, No 2 (2024): Lathaif: Literasi Tafsir, Hadis dan Filologi
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31958/lathaif.v3i2.13776

Abstract

The phenomenon of Qur'anic interpretation is increasingly haphazard, especially in the highly disruptive 21st century. Although the Qur'an is open to be understood by anyone, we must criticize the ideology of the reader as an interpreter to investigate the subjectivity of interpretation. Through a comparative study of the negotiation hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd and Khaled Abou el-Fadl, this article aims to direct the interpreter to a progressive quasi-objectivist typology, which suppresses the subjectivity of interpretation and recontextualization according to the times to get out of the rigidity of understanding. This study aims to compare the negotiation hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd and Khaled Abou el-Fadl through Paul Ricoeur's meta-hermeneutic approach. By using a descriptive qualitative method, this study explores the similarities, differences, and relevance of the two figures' hermeneutics in the contemporary context. The results show that this integrative approach is effective in revisiting the negotiation hermeneutics of the two figures to complement the study of Qur'anic hermeneutics, offering practical contributions to the balance of interpretation, as well as looking at the phenomenon of interpreters and audiences that occur in Indonesia. Practically, this article emphasizes the urgency of moral-based interpretation and transparency, creating harmonization between interpreters and audiences. Academically, this research offers a more inclusive ideology of hermeneutical balance of negotiation through the development of al-Qur'anic hermeneutic discourse in critical-ideological aspects while explaining its relevance to the needs of Indonesian people in this contemporary century. 
PERDAMAIAN DALAM ISLAM DAN BUDDHA PERSPEKTIF AL-QUR’AN DAN TRIPITAKA: Perspectives from the Qur’an and the Tripitaka Hidayah, Alfa Handi; Kusumawati, Devi; Al-Ghifari Syatta, Muhammad Miqdad
Al Hikmah Vol 11 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/ah.v11i1.24677

Abstract

Indonesia, as a multireligious country, faces challenges of conflicts often carried out in the name of religion. The Qur’an and Tripitaka, as the sacred texts of Islam and Buddhism, teach values of peace, tolerance, and harmony that can serve as solutions to interfaith conflicts. This study aims to compare the concepts of peace in the Qur’an and Tripitaka, analyze their similarities and differences, and evaluate the application of these values in resolving interreligious conflicts. The research adopts a qualitative approach using a comparative study method. Data were collected through textual analysis of the Qur’an and Tripitaka as primary sources, along with relevant secondary literature. The analysis identified peace concepts and their social relevance. The findings reveal that the Qur’an emphasizes peace through Iṣlāḥ (reconciliation) and Salám (peace), while the Tripitaka highlights Metta (loving-kindness), Karuna (compassion), and Upekkha (equanimity). Both religions reject violence, with Islam focusing more on practical solutions, while Buddhism emphasizes individual transformation. The peace concepts in the Qur’an and Tripitaka can form the foundation for interfaith dialogue, fostering tolerance and harmony in society. Implementing these values is crucial to resolving conflicts in diverse communities and promoting interreligious harmony.