Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP REGULASI BPOM DALAM PENGAWASAN JUAL BELI SUSU KENTAL MANIS DENGAN KADAR GULA TINGGI Rosandi Firmawan; Achmad Fathoni Alfaris; Amzahril Azis; Erviana Resyia
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): Desember : Jurnal Sains Student Research
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v2i6.2965

Abstract

Sweetened condensed milk (SCM) is a popular product in Indonesia; however, it often contains high levels of sugar, which can have adverse health effects. Excessive sugar consumption is associated with health issues such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. The Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM) plays a crucial role in monitoring this product to protect consumers. BPOM regulations concerning the supervision of SCM, such as the Head of BPOM Regulation No. 31 of 2018, govern product labeling, including the prohibition of misleading health claims and the requirement to provide clear information regarding sugar content. Although these regulations exist, their implementation faces challenges, such as limited surveillance and weak enforcement. Misleading marketing and labeling practices still occur, with many producers claiming SCM is a healthy product, especially for children. This contradicts BPOM regulations and has the potential to mislead consumers, particularly parents. Therefore, a juridical analysis of BPOM regulations is essential to ensure consumer protection and strengthen the monitoring of SCM products. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of BPOM regulations in supervising the sale of SCM and the juridical implications that can be taken to improve consumer protection. Cooperation between BPOM, producers, and the media is needed to enhance public education and strengthen law enforcement to control excessive sugar consumption.
ANALISIS PRAKTIK PERLOMBAAN MEMANCING PERSPEKTIF HUKUM EKONOMI SYARI’AH: (Studi Kasus di Kolam Pancing Selma Dsn. Sedati Ds. Kauman Kec. Ngoro Kab. Jombang) Amzahril Azis; Syai’in Syai’in
JURNAL AKADEMIK EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): JURNAL AKADEMIK EKONOMI DAN MANAJEMEN  September
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jaem.v2i3.5516

Abstract

Amzahril Azis 2025. Analysis of Fishing Competition Practices from the Perspective of Sharia Economic Law (Case Study at Selma Fishing Pond, Sedati Hamlet, Kauman Village, Ngoro District). Thesis, Sharia Economic Law Study Program, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Hasyim Asy’ari Tebuireng University Jombang, Advisor; Syai’in, M.Sy.The author conducted a research titled "An Analysis of Fishing Competition Practices from the Perspective of Sharia Economic Law (Case Study at Selma Fishing Pond, Sedati Hamlet, Kauman Village, Ngoro Sub-district, Jombang Regency)." This study aims to answer two questions: (1) how fishing competitions are conducted at Selma Fishing Pond, and (2) how these practices are viewed from the perspective of Sharia Economic Law.The theoretical framework emphasizes a general overview of competitions in Islam, an overview of fishing competitions, and an overview of Sharia Economic Law. These theories are essential for analyzing the fishing competition practices in accordance with the contracts recognized in Sharia Economic Law.This study examines the fishing competition practices at Selma Fishing Pond in Sedati Hamlet, Kauman Village, Ngoro Sub-district, Jombang Regency, using a Sharia Economic Law perspective. The research employs an empirical juridical approach, using descriptive analysis and relevant documents related to Sharia Economic Law to analyze the fishing competition practices. Selma Fishing Pond is a local recreational destination that provides fishing facilities with both paid and free competition systems. The paid competitions require a participation fee and offer cash prizes and door prizes, while the free competitions are held on special occasions without any fees.This study analyzes the legality of these systems through the lens of Sharia Economic Law, covering aspects such as contracts (akad), and the prevention of gharar (uncertainty) and maysir (gambling). The analysis shows that the paid competition system can be categorized under valid ijarah (rental of facilities) and ju’alah (reward for achievement) contracts in Islamic law, as long as there is clarity of benefits and transparency in fund usage. The direct benefit in the form of fish catch for non-winners also supports the legality of this system.Meanwhile, the free competition system reflects the principles of hibah (gift) and ju’alah, free from gharar and maysir elements, and therefore does not contradict Islamic principles. It also contributes to enhanced social interaction and business sustainability.