Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Sains Student Research JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK
Axel Imanuel Tania
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Sistem Pembuktian terhadap Perceraian di Indonesia Yuni Priskila Ginting; Axel Imanuel Tania; Cherish Young; Felicia Evelyn; Jennifer Almelia Lim; Kenzie Betha Addison; Suhan Chae; Thalia Jamiana Kuang
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): Desember : Jurnal Sains Student Research
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v2i6.2971

Abstract

The legal evidentiary system in divorce cases in Indonesia is an important aspect of family law that has an influence on the outcome of a marriage break-up. Divorce, as a legal act, is the official termination of the marriage bond between husband and wife that is recognized by a court decision. Filing for a divorce process can only be done before a Court Hearing; this happens if previous mediation efforts have been made by the competent Court but have not yielded results. In the context of civil law, a divorce application by a husband and wife can only be accepted based on clear reasons and regulated by law. Divorce is the last option in resolving conflicts between husband and wife after various efforts to maintain the marital relationship have been made but have not produced the expected changes and indicate that the husband and wife are no longer able to live together as a married couple. To better understand the legal regulations regarding divorce in the Indonesian legal system, this journal article discusses the legal evidentiary system for this matter.
Sistem Pembuktian terhadap Praktik Penimbunan Barang Impor Ilegal oleh Pelaku Usaha Yuni Priskila Ginting; Axel Imanuel Tania; Cherish Young; Felicia Evelyn; Jennifer Almelia Lim; Kenzie Betha Addison; Suhan Chae; Thalia Jamiana Kuang
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v1i5.2714

Abstract

With increasingly tight market competition, illegal imported goods that should have been destroyed because they failed security checks are hoarded by business actors to seek more profit rather than following the laws and regulations that have been set, thus becoming an unlawful act. There are also illegal imported goods that do not even receive checks, but rather go through a smuggling process across state borders. Because of the smuggling process, these foreign goods cannot be traced by the state, so they do not have official distribution permits in trade, and therefore risk causing financial losses to the state because they do not pay any taxes at all. This incident occurs because the public has minimal legal knowledge and does not even care at all about the main reason for seeking maximum profit. Incidents like this often occur due to minimal supervision from the authorities, as well as a lack of evidence to ensure that the business actor can be said to have committed an unlawful act; the legal process is halted.
Studi Perbandingan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia dan Tiongkok Axel Imanuel Tania; Jennifer Almelia Lim; Chae, Suhan; Thalia Jamiana Kuang
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): Desember
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v1i6.3021

Abstract

Consumer Protection is an essential aspect of legal systems, aimed at safeguarding consumer rights in transactions and ensuring fair market practices. This study aims to compare the consumer protection frameworks in Indonesia and China, focusing on regulatory structures, enforcement mechanisms, and their impact on consumer welfare. Using a normative legal research method, the study examines laws, regulations, and related legal principles governing consumer rights in both countries. The findings reveal significant differences in the approaches to consumer protection: Indonesia emphasizes dispute resolution through mediation and arbitration under the Consumer Protection Act (Law No. 8 of 1999), while China relies heavily on administrative enforcement and penalties under the Consumer Rights Protection Law. This comparative study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each legal system, providing insights into their effectiveness in addressing consumer issues in a rapidly changing global economy.
Co-Authors Chae, Suhan Cherish Young Felicia Evelyn Jennifer Almelia Lim Kenzie Betha Addison Suhan Chae Thalia Jamiana Kuang Yuni Priskila Ginting