Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK
Chae, Suhan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Studi Perbandingan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia dan Tiongkok Axel Imanuel Tania; Jennifer Almelia Lim; Chae, Suhan; Thalia Jamiana Kuang
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024): Desember
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v1i6.3021

Abstract

Consumer Protection is an essential aspect of legal systems, aimed at safeguarding consumer rights in transactions and ensuring fair market practices. This study aims to compare the consumer protection frameworks in Indonesia and China, focusing on regulatory structures, enforcement mechanisms, and their impact on consumer welfare. Using a normative legal research method, the study examines laws, regulations, and related legal principles governing consumer rights in both countries. The findings reveal significant differences in the approaches to consumer protection: Indonesia emphasizes dispute resolution through mediation and arbitration under the Consumer Protection Act (Law No. 8 of 1999), while China relies heavily on administrative enforcement and penalties under the Consumer Rights Protection Law. This comparative study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each legal system, providing insights into their effectiveness in addressing consumer issues in a rapidly changing global economy.
Analysis of the Implementation of Simple Laws as an Efficiency Effort to Resolve Civil Disputes Salim, Stefano; Capello, Julio; Rania, Andi; Chae, Suhan; Sabatini, Angel
Devotion : Journal of Research and Community Service Vol. 6 No. 12 (2025): Devotion: Journal of Community Research
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/devotion.v6i12.25604

Abstract

Conventional civil litigation in Indonesia has long faced chronic challenges in the form of slow, complicated, and expensive processes. In response, the Supreme Court launched a breakthrough in procedural law through Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 2 of 2015, which was revised by PERMA Number 4 of 2019 concerning Procedures for the Settlement of Small Claims. This regulation aims to realize the principle of simple, fast, and low-cost justice, especially for disputes with limited material value. This research uses a library research method with a juridical-normative approach to analyze the implementation of PERMA. The analysis reveals that although the small claims law (GS) has succeeded in creating significant procedural efficiencies at the examination stage—primarily through the 25-day time limit and the simplification of procedural law—its implementation in the field has not achieved holistic efficiency. Three main obstacles were identified: inconsistent compliance with the 25-day deadline across courts, the “paradox of proof” that allows defendants to complicate evidence and lead to inadmissibility rulings, and the “irony of execution” where fast decisions must still be enforced through slow general procedures due to the lack of a special execution mechanism in PERMA. This study concludes that efficiency is realized only at the examination stage and recommends amending PERMA to introduce a simpler execution mechanism, as well as optimizing the use of immediate decisions (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) by judges as a practical solution.  
Co-Authors Axel Imanuel Tania Capello, Julio Jennifer Almelia Lim Rania, Andi Sabatini, Angel Salim, Stefano Thalia Jamiana Kuang