Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Khairun Law Journal KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL Riau Law Journal
Pratiwi, Norma Risca
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Pratiwi, Norma Risca; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Pratiwi, Norma Risca; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Aparat Penegak Hukum atas Penundaan dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kasus PT Krakatau Steel (Studi Hukum Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang) Pratiwi, Norma Risca; S.H., M.H., Ridwan; Rofiana, S.H., M.H., Reine
Riau Law Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2024): Riau Law Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.v8i1.8268

Abstract

Pada proses pemeriksaan perkara tindak pidana korupsi PT Krakatau Steel ini, adanya pengabaian kewajiban hukum oleh aparat penegak hukum terhadap pemenuhan hak-hak terdakwa. Permasalahan utama yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana proses penundaan dalam proses peradilan pidana tindak pidana korupsi kasus PT Krakatau Steel dan bagaimana bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap aparat penegak hukum atas penundaan dalam proses peradilan pidana tindak pidana korupsi kasus PT Krakatau Steel (Studi Hukum Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Serang). Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa dalam proses pemeriksaan perkara tindak pidana korupsi kasus PT Krakatau Steel pada proses pembuktian di persidangan yang merupakan bagian dari tahap penuntutan dalam proses peradilan pidana sering terjadi penundaan hingga 7 kali oleh jaksa dan hakim ad hoc pengganti. Bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap aparat penegak hukum atas penundaan dalam proses peradilan pidana tindak pidana korupsi kasus PT Krakatau Steel yaitu jaksa dan hakim ad hoc pengganti atas perbuatannya yang melakukan penundaan persidangan dengan tidak menuruti perintah menurut undang-undang oleh pejabat sebagaimana bentuk penghinaan terhadap peradilan (contempt of court). Sehingga jaksa dan hakim ad hoc pengganti tersebut dapatlah dimintai pertanggungjawaban secara pidana dengan Pasal 216 ayat (1) KUHP tentang Kejahatan Terhadap Penguasa Umum.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Pratiwi, Norma Risca; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL Pratiwi, Norma Risca; Ridwan, Ridwan; Rofiana, Reine
Khairun Law Journal Volume 8 Issue 1, September 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Abstract

In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.
Co-Authors Ridwan, Ridwan Rofiana, Reine Rofiana, S.H., M.H., Reine S.H., M.H., Ridwan