Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Nakula: Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Ilmu Sosial
Rina Endang Sulistiowati
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Mathematics Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dengan Mengintegrasikan Problem Based Learning (PBL) dan Kahoot dalam Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Rina Endang Sulistiowati; I Wayan Widana
Jurnal Nakula : Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/nakula.v3i1.1429

Abstract

This research discusses the optimization of implementing collaborative learning in the topic of norms and rules, integrating the Problem Based Learning (PBL) approach and Kahoot games with with assessments conducted both in groups and individually, along with observations by an observer. The study was conducted at MIN 1 Balikpapan with 28 students consisting of 12 male students and 16 female students. The assessment was designed to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and social skills through innovative and interactive methods. Observation results show that students are able to communicate and work together effectively in groups, while the presentation and question and answer stages encourage critical thinking skills and self-confidence. The group-based Kahoot game created a fun and competitive atmosphere, increasing students’ motivation and engagement in learning. Individual evaluations conducted at the end of the assessment measured the extent of students' understanding after the collaborative learning process. Overall, this assessment approach successfully fostered an active learning environment that supported the development of students' understanding of the material, social skills, and independent learning abilities. Final results showed that 29% of students achieved a perfect score of 100, 32% scored 90, 21% scored 80, and 14% achieved a passing grade with a score of 70. Only 4% of students did not meet the passing criteria, scoring 60. These findings demonstrate that the majority of students were able to achieve satisfactory learning outcomes.
Implementasi Teori Kognitif terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Rina Endang Sulistiowati; I Gede Astawan
Jurnal Nakula : Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/nakula.v3i2.1631

Abstract

Scientific literacy is the ability of students to understand, translate, use information, and evaluate scientific problems in everyday life through critical thinking. This study aims to measure the level of scientific literacy of fifth grade students of MIN 1 Balikpapan, including identifying possible misconceptions. Misconceptions themselves refer to errors in understanding or erroneous concepts held by students. For elementary school teachers, understanding misconceptions is very important because it can be a reflection to improve the quality of science learning in the classroom, which ultimately has an impact on students' scientific literacy abilities. The results showed that the level of scientific literacy of fifth grade students of MIN 1 Balikpapan was relatively high, with 63.3% of students understanding the concept of simple machines well, 13.3% of students not understanding the concept, and 23.3% of students experiencing misconceptions. According to Piaget's theory, improving students' cognitive abilities can be achieved through student-centered learning and encouraging active discovery. However, based on the results of the analysis of scientific literacy questions, three indicators were found that still had low scores (below 60%), namely indicators related to scientific design and science experiments.
Co-Authors I Gede Astawan I Wayan Widana